Ms. magazine  -- more than a magazine a movement

SIGN UP FOR MS. DIGEST, JOBS, NEWS AND ALERTS

FEMINIST WIRE NEWSBRIEFS

ABOUT
SEE CURRENT ISSUE
SHOP MS. STORE
MS. IN THE CLASSROOM
FEMINIST DAILY WIRE
FEMINIST RESOURCES
PRESS
JOBS AT MS.
READ BACK ISSUES
CONTACT
RSS (XML)
 
feminist wire | daily newsbriefs

November-06-06

SD Abortion Ban Lobby Received $750,000 in Questionable Funds

On the eve of Tuesdayís election, news has broken that Vote Yes for Life, the group trying to pass a sweeping abortion ban in South Dakota, may have received an illegal donation of $750,000 -- the largest single amount received by either side of the South Dakota abortion ban debate. The disputed money came from Promising Futures, Inc., a company set up by the banís author and sponsor, State Representative Roger Hunt, to collect donations for Vote Yes. Promising Futures disclosed the $750,000 donation three days after the October 31 deadline and failed to include the original donorís name. Both late filing and anonymous donations over $100 violate state law, South Dakota's Secretary of State told the Argus Leader Saturday.

The Argus Leader has demanded that Hunt reveal the original donor's name, blasting the representative for "hiding behind what he admits is a sham corporation." The South Dakota Campaign for Healthy Families, the primary organization mobilizing voters against the ban, has called for an expedited investigation by the attorney general and has formally asked Vote Yes for Life to return the money.

"This is yet another example of the continued campaign of dishonesty coming out of the Vote Yes camp," said Healthy Families Co-Chair Jan Nicolay in an official statement. "They lied about the lack of exceptions for rape and incest victims... for the womanís health and for fetal anomalies... Itís no surprise that the Vote Yes for Life Campaign would fudge their numbers, too."

The financing scandal is not the first problem for Vote Yes for Life. This summer, watchdog group Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) filed a complaint with the IRS over Vote Yes's alleged use of federal funds to lobby for the ban.

DONATE to support the Feminist Majority Foundation's efforts to defeat the abortion ban in South Dakota. Half of your donation will go to the Campaign for Health Families for media ads.

LEARN MORE Read the Ms. magazine article Showdown on the Plains

JOIN Ms. magazine and receive the premier feminist publication delivered to your door

Media Resources: Sioux Falls Argus Leader 11/4, 11/3; Keloland TV 11/3, 11/2; South Dakota Campaign for Healthy Families 11/3; Ms. Fall 2006


© Feminist Majority Foundation, publisher of Ms. magazine

If you liked this story, consider making a tax-deductible donation to support Ms. magazine.

 

 

Send to a Friend
Their
Your
Comments
(optional)


More Feminist News

10/30/2014 Medication Abortion Access Threatened by Oklahoma Court Ruling - An Oklahoma state district court judge has refused to block a state law restricting medication abortion, clearing the way for the law to go into affect on November 1. The Oklahoma Coalition for Reproductive Justice, together with a local abortion clinic in Tulsa, challenged HB 2684 in September, arguing that the law was an unconstitutional restriction on non-surgical abortion in the earliest weeks of pregnancy. . . .
 
10/30/2014 UPS Switches Pregnant Worker Policy Ahead of Supreme Court Case - The United Parcel Service (UPS) is changing its policy on light duty assignments for pregnant workers, even though the company will stand by its refusal to extend accommodations to a former employee in an upcoming Supreme Court case. UPS announced on Monday in a memo to employees, and in a brief filed with the US Supreme Court, that the company will begin offering temporary, light-duty positions to pregnant workers on January 1, 2015. . . .
 
10/29/2014 North Dakota Supreme Court Upholds Abortion Restrictions - The North Dakota Supreme Court yesterday upheld a set of misguided restrictions on medication abortion, allowing what is effectively a ban on early, non-surgical abortions in the state to go into effect immediately. The decision overturned a lower court order finding the law, known as HB 1297, unconstitutional and permanently blocking its enforcement. . . .