SD Abortion Ban Lobby Received $750,000 in Questionable Funds
On the eve of Tuesdayís election, news has broken that Vote Yes for Life, the group trying to pass a sweeping abortion ban in South Dakota, may have received an illegal donation of $750,000 -- the largest single amount received by either side of the South Dakota abortion ban debate. The disputed money came from Promising Futures, Inc., a company set up by the banís author and sponsor, State Representative Roger Hunt, to collect donations for Vote Yes. Promising Futures disclosed the $750,000 donation three days after the October 31 deadline and failed to include the original donorís name. Both late filing and anonymous donations over $100 violate state law, South Dakota's Secretary of State told the Argus Leader Saturday.
The Argus Leader has demanded that Hunt reveal the original donor's name, blasting the representative for "hiding behind what he admits is a sham corporation." The South Dakota Campaign for Healthy Families, the primary organization mobilizing voters against the ban, has called for an expedited investigation by the attorney general and has formally asked Vote Yes for Life to return the money.
"This is yet another example of the continued campaign of dishonesty coming out of the Vote Yes camp," said Healthy Families Co-Chair Jan Nicolay in an official statement. "They lied about the lack of exceptions for rape and incest victims... for the womanís health and for fetal anomalies... Itís no surprise that the Vote Yes for Life Campaign would fudge their numbers, too."
3/7/2014 Study Finds Continuing Gender Gap in Medical Research - Although 20 years have passed since the government instituted legislation requiring adequate female representation in medical studies, a recent study finds that a significant sex and gender gap still persists in medical research.
"Sex-Specific Medical Research: Why Women's Health Can't Wait" by researchers at the Connors Center for Women's Health and Gender Biology at Brigham and Women's Hospital and the Jacobs Institute at George Washington University Hospital finds that scientists still fail to account for differences between males and females. . . .