Ms. magazine  -- more than a magazine a movement

SIGN UP FOR MS. DIGEST, JOBS, NEWS AND ALERTS

FEMINIST WIRE NEWSBRIEFS

ABOUT
SEE CURRENT ISSUE
SHOP MS. STORE
MS. IN THE CLASSROOM
FEMINIST DAILY WIRE
FEMINIST RESOURCES
PRESS
JOBS AT MS.
READ BACK ISSUES
CONTACT
RSS (XML)
 
feminist wire | daily newsbriefs

October-12-06

South Dakota Abortion Ban Advocates Use "Feminist" Language

Anti-abortion advocates in South Dakota have turned to women-centered messages to promote the extensive abortion ban on November's ballot. While some anti-abortion advocates are using traditional "pro-life" messages by holding a "bucks for babies" fundraiser or a Rock for Life concert, others are promoting the message that "abortion hurts women," the Los Angeles Times reports. Some anti-abortion advocates are even using emergency contraception (EC) as an alternative to abortion for the sake of legitimizing the South Dakota ban, Feministing reports.

The anti-abortion camp is alleging that the right to chose a legal, safe abortion "exploits women," UPI reports. Leslee Unruh, a campaign manager for South Dakotaís anti-abortion activists, told the Los Angeles Times, "We women buy the choice line. Weíre panicked , or weíre being pressured," but that "if you donít do your job right as a mother, what good is anything else?"

Unruhís logic echoes that of the South Dakota Task Force to Study Abortion by arguing that choosing an abortion is against the nature of women. The task forceís report claimed that a woman would never freely choose abortion because to do so would violate "the motherís fundamental natural intrinsic right to a relationship with her child," the American Prospect reports.

The ban (SD HB 1215) would criminalize all abortions without exceptions for rape, incest, or a womanís health. The only exception would be to prevent the death of a woman. Jan Nicolay, co-chair of the Campaign for Healthy Families, which is leading the efforts to defeat the ban, told Reuters, "the only time you can even discuss an abortion is when a woman is dying. We canít let this happen." The ban was signed into law March 6 by Governor Mike Rounds, but was stayed by petitioners who gathered enough signatures to move the ban onto the November 7th ballot.

DONATE to support the Feminist Majority Foundationís efforts to defeat the South Dakota abortion ban. Half of your emergency contribution will go directly to the South Dakota Campaign for Healthy Families.

JOIN Ms. magazine and receive the premier feminist magazine delivered to your door. The current issue includes an article on the extreme South Dakota abortion ban

Media Resources: The Los Angeles Times 10/9/06; Reuters 10/11/06; UPI 10/9/06; Kaiser Daily Womenís Health Policy 10/12/06, 10/10/06; American Prospect 10/3/06; Feministing.com 10/11/06


© Feminist Majority Foundation, publisher of Ms. magazine

If you liked this story, consider making a tax-deductible donation to support Ms. magazine.

 

 

Send to a Friend
Their
Your
Comments
(optional)


More Feminist News

7/1/2015 Women's Rights Activists are Suing the Kenyan Government for Reproductive Rights - A woman in Kenya is suing the Kenyan government for failure to provide safe and legal abortions, which caused her daughter - a 15-year-old rape victim - to suffer a kidney failure after undergoing the procedure illegally. Currently, there are four petitioners on the case: the mother of the survivor, the Federation of Women Lawyers-Kenya, and two other women's rights advocates. . . .
 
6/30/2015 Community Members, Advocates, and Celebrities Stand in Support with Bree Newsome - On June 27, at about 6:30 AM, Bree Newsome scaled the flagpole at South Carolina's Statehouse and removed the confederate flag. . . .
 
6/30/2015 Supreme Court Ruling Prevents Gerrymandering in Arizona - In a 5-4 decision delivered by Justice Ginsburg this morning, the Supreme Court upheld Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission, allowing the use of independent state commissions that draw federal congressional districts, taking that power away from the state legislature. This gives states an opportunity to deal with partisan gerrymandering by giving an independent commission power to draw federal congressional districts. In 2000, Arizona voters amended their constitution, shifting the responsibility of drawing congressional districts, previously held by the state legislature, to a panel called the Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission. . . .