Ralph Reed, Linked to Abramoff, Faces Tough Primary Race in Georgia
Former Christian Coalition Executive Director Ralph Reed faces a tough primary race today for lieutenant governor of Georgia. Dogged by ties to disgraced lobbyist Jack Abramoff, Reed and primary opponent Casey Cagle, a longtime Georgia state senator, are running neck and neck, according to the Atlanta Journal-Constitution.
According to the charges against Abramoff, who was a lobbyist for some Indian tribes with casinos, more than $5.3 million from these casinos was funneled to Reed through nonprofit organizations in return for Reed’s work urging Christian supporters to boycott casinos in competition with Abramoff’s clients, the Journal-Constitution reports. Reed has also been linked to Abramoff’s work as a lobbyist for the Northern Mariana Islands, a US territory, and its garment industry. A Ms. investigation documented what amounts to indentured servitude for the garment workers on the Islands: substandard living and dangerous working conditions, forced abortions, and a declining labor market that has left many women few options than to be trafficked into the sex trade.
Cagle, a more moderate Republican, has been running ads calling Reed “hypocritical and immoral,” accusing Reed of “manipulating Christians for casinos” and saying that Reed defended the economic system in the Marianas, according to the New York Times.
Reed, however, still appears to be confident that he can win, telling one concerned supporter, “Don’t worry … We know what we’re doing. Just call your friends and tell them to vote … We’re fine,” the Times reports. According to Congresswoman Cynthia McKinney (D-GA), there have already been numerous problems with Diebold voting machines just hours into voting, including machine malfunctions that caused some voters to unintentionally vote for the wrong candidate.
Media Resources: Atlanta Journal-Constitution 7/16/06, 7/18/06; New York Times 7/16/06; Cynthis McKinney for Congress 7/18/06; Ms. magazine Spring 2006
10/31/2014 Federal Judge Exempts Another Catholic University from Birth Control Coverage - A federal judge ruled Tuesday that Ave Maria University, a Catholic university in Florida, does not have to comply with federal rules meant to ensure that covered employees can exercise their right to obtain birth control at no cost.
The Affordable Care Act requires all new health insurance plans to cover all FDA-approved contraceptives - such as the pill, emergency contraceptives, and IUDs - without charging co-pays, deductibles or co-insurance. . . .
10/31/2014 Women of Color in Tennessee Are United in Opposition to Amendment 1 - Just days before the general election in Tennessee, a coalition of community leaders, clergy, and advocates led a press conference encouraging women of color to vote no on Amendment 1, a dangerous and far-reaching measure on the state's ballot.
SisterReach, a grassroots organization focused on "empowering, organizing, and mobilizing women and girls in the community around their reproductive and sexual health to make informed decisions about themselves," organized the press conference "to call attention to the unique concerns Black and poor communities throughout Shelby County and across the state of Tennessee face on a daily basis" and to emphasize how the upcoming election "could further limit [black women's] reproductive, economic, political, and social autonomy."
"We assemble today to impress upon black women and women of color, many of whom are heads of households, to get out and vote," said SisterReacher Founder and CEO Cherisse Scott at the event.
SisterReach has been educating voters about the particularly dangerous impact of Amendment 1 on women of color. . . .
10/30/2014 Medication Abortion Access Threatened by Oklahoma Court Ruling - An Oklahoma state district court judge has refused to block a state law restricting medication abortion, clearing the way for the law to go into affect on November 1.
The Oklahoma Coalition for Reproductive Justice, together with a local abortion clinic in Tulsa, challenged HB 2684 in September, arguing that the law was an unconstitutional restriction on non-surgical abortion in the earliest weeks of pregnancy. . . .