Controversial Bush Nominee Boyle Failed to Acknowledge Conflicts of Interest
A new report has revealed that US District Court Judge Terrence Boyle, President Bush's nominee to the Fourth US Circuit Court of Appeals, failed to recuse himself from nine cases in which he had a conflict of interest. According to Salon and the Center for Investigative Reporting (CIR), five corporations in which Judge Boyle acknowledged having financial investments were party to the nine cases. Boyle ruled for the company in which he was invested in the majority of these cases but violated federal law simply by agreeing to hear the case, regardless of his ruling, according to Salon.
Normally, a computer system would assign cases and eliminate conflicts of interest but, Salon reports, “Boyle’s court…doesn’t use the system. Instead judges themselves are responsible for looking over cases assigned to them.” Professor Monroe Freedman, who teaches ethics at the Hofstra University School of Law, stated to Salon that by refusing to recuse himself, “He is disregarding the law.”
According to the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights, Boyle’s rulings have been overturned by the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals more than 150 times, and he has issued numerous opinions hostile to affirmative action, women’s rights, fair employment, and voting rights. The Feminist Majority is opposing Terrence Boyle’s confirmation, along with a broad coalition of women’s rights, civil rights, disability rights, lesbian and gay rights, and labor groups.
Media Resources: Salon 5/1/06; Feminist Daily News Wire 6/20/05
10/31/2014 Federal Judge Exempts Another Catholic University from Birth Control Coverage - A federal judge ruled Tuesday that Ave Maria University, a Catholic university in Florida, does not have to comply with federal rules meant to ensure that covered employees can exercise their right to obtain birth control at no cost.
The Affordable Care Act requires all new health insurance plans to cover all FDA-approved contraceptives - such as the pill, emergency contraceptives, and IUDs - without charging co-pays, deductibles or co-insurance. . . .
10/31/2014 Women of Color in Tennessee Are United in Opposition to Amendment 1 - Just days before the general election in Tennessee, a coalition of community leaders, clergy, and advocates led a press conference encouraging women of color to vote no on Amendment 1, a dangerous and far-reaching measure on the state's ballot.
SisterReach, a grassroots organization focused on "empowering, organizing, and mobilizing women and girls in the community around their reproductive and sexual health to make informed decisions about themselves," organized the press conference "to call attention to the unique concerns Black and poor communities throughout Shelby County and across the state of Tennessee face on a daily basis" and to emphasize how the upcoming election "could further limit [black women's] reproductive, economic, political, and social autonomy."
"We assemble today to impress upon black women and women of color, many of whom are heads of households, to get out and vote," said SisterReacher Founder and CEO Cherisse Scott at the event.
SisterReach has been educating voters about the particularly dangerous impact of Amendment 1 on women of color. . . .
10/30/2014 Medication Abortion Access Threatened by Oklahoma Court Ruling - An Oklahoma state district court judge has refused to block a state law restricting medication abortion, clearing the way for the law to go into affect on November 1.
The Oklahoma Coalition for Reproductive Justice, together with a local abortion clinic in Tulsa, challenged HB 2684 in September, arguing that the law was an unconstitutional restriction on non-surgical abortion in the earliest weeks of pregnancy. . . .