Michigan Anti-Civil Rights Initiative Language Approved
The Michigan Board of Canvassers on Friday approved language for an anti-affirmative action ballot initiative to be placed on the ballot this November. The proposed constitutional amendment would ban affirmative action for women and people of color in university admission, state hiring, and government contracting decisions. The Board in December had refused to approve the language, and was ordered to take action by January 20 by the Michigan Court of Appeals.
The major proponent of the measure, misleadingly named the Michigan Civil Rights Initiative (MCRI), is Ward Connerly, who engineered a similar ballot measure in California in 1996 (Proposition 209). The California measure was opposed by a broad coalition of women's rights and civil rights groups, including the Feminist Majority, the National Organization for Women, the YWCA, and the NAACP Legal Defense and Education Fund. A coalition called One United Michigan has been formed to fight the upcoming initiative.
The Michigan Civil Rights Commission is investigating claims of wrongdoing by MCRI in gathering signatures in order for the ballot initiative to qualify for the 2006 election. Opponents of the measure argue that many of the voters who added their signatures were misled into believing the measure was intended to protect affirmative action in the state, not eliminate it, according to the Lansing State Journal.
Media Resources: Lansing State Journal 1/21/06; Macomb Daily News 1/21/06; Detroit Free Press 1/20/06
10/21/2014 Afghanistan's New First Lady Advances Women's Issues - Just a few days after moving to the presidential palace, Afghanistan's new First Lady Rula Ghani said that she hopes to encourage greater respect for women.
Rula Ghani already broke tradition by participating in her husband, Ashraf Ghani Ahmadzai's, campaign for President. . . .
10/21/2014 Hulu Silences Rape Survivor Speaking Out Against Anti-Abortion Amendment 67 in Colorado - Hulu, an online, ad-supported streaming service, has refused to run an advertisement from the "No on 67" campaign in Colorado, citing the company's policy regarding "controversial" political positions on issues like abortion.
In a letter to the CEO of Hulu, dated October 10, the Vote No on 67 Campaign, which is supported by the Feminist Majority Foundation, asked the company to reconsider its unwillingness to air a 35-second spot featuring a rape survivor's testimony about the far-reaching impact of Colorado's proposed Amendment 67. . . .