Ms. magazine  -- more than a magazine a movement

SIGN UP FOR MS. DIGEST, JOBS, NEWS AND ALERTS

FEMINIST WIRE NEWSBRIEFS

ABOUT
SEE CURRENT ISSUE
SHOP MS. STORE
MS. IN THE CLASSROOM
FEMINIST DAILY WIRE
FEMINIST RESOURCES
PRESS
JOBS AT MS.
READ BACK ISSUES
CONTACT
RSS (XML)
 
feminist wire | daily newsbriefs

September-12-05

Hearings on Roberts Begin; Groups Opposing Roberts Hold Demonstrations

The Senate Judiciary Committee hearings on John Roberts for the Supreme Court begin today. Women’s and civil rights groups held a dawn vigil and a lunchtime demonstration today to urge Senators to vote “no” on Roberts.

“As Chief Justice, John Roberts would be in the nation’s top judicial leadership position and could lead the rollback of the gains made by women and people of color over the past 40 years,” said Eleanor Smeal, president of the Feminist Majority. His record indicates he would greatly weaken anti-discrimination statutes in employment and education; ignore wage discrimination; gut Title IX; water down voting rights; cut back affirmative action; eliminate the right to privacy (which he has mocked); and reverse Roe v. Wade.

Heightening the already grave concerns of women’s rights organizations is Roberts’ position on sex discrimination and the Equal Protection Clause of the Constitution’s 14th Amendment. Based on documents released from Roberts’ time in the Reagan Administration, the National Women’s Law Center (NWLC) concluded that Roberts “objected to, and was willing simply to ignore,” the settled principle that laws or government policies that discriminate “on the basis of sex [are] subject to ‘heightened scrutiny’ – and will be struck down unless the government can show it has an ‘exceedingly persuasive justification’ for the discrimination.” In several memos, Roberts argued that only racial discrimination is covered in the 14th Amendment’s required heightened scrutiny, not sex discrimination. This same view was expressed by Robert Bork during his Supreme Court confirmation hearings, and it was one of the main reasons he was rejected, along with his views on the right to privacy. This view is very dangerous for women’s opportunities and protection from discrimination – as the NWLC explains, “[i]n the absence of an Equal Rights Amendment, it is this very constitutional guarantee that has prevented states and the federal government from limiting women’s careers, their service on juries, the family benefits to which they are entitled while serving in the military, educational opportunities, social security benefits for their families, and equal treatment for women in a myriad of other ways.”

LEARN MORE about Roberts' position on sex discrimination and the Equal Protection Clause from this National Women's Law Center fact sheet

LEARN MORE Read Ms. magazine’s Urgent Report on What’s at Stake for Women in the Supreme Court Fight

JOIN Ms. magazine and support independent media

Media Resources: Feminist Majority; National Women’s Law Center report 8/31/05; NWLC fact sheet September 2005


© Feminist Majority Foundation, publisher of Ms. magazine

If you liked this story, consider making a tax-deductible donation to support Ms. magazine.

 

 

Send to a Friend
Their
Your
Comments
(optional)


More Feminist News

8/26/2014 More Investment in Women's Health Needed as Africa's Population Rises - Africa's population will reach four billion by 2100, according to a report released by UNICEF early this week. . . .
 
8/26/2014 92 Million Dollar Project Will Improve Higher Education in Afghanistan - The US Agency for International Development (USAID) announced a $92 million project to improve the higher education system in Afghanistan last week. The University Support and Workforce Development Project (USWDP) represents a five-year plan between USAID and the Afghan Ministry of Higher Education (MoHE) and Ministry of Economy to improve Afghanistan's educational programs according to international standards. . . .
 
8/25/2014 Advocates Seek to Block Louisiana TRAP Law in Federal Suit - Friday, the Center for Reproductive Rights joined a federal lawsuit challenging a Louisiana TRAP (Targeted Regulation of Abortion Providers) law set to take effect September 1. The suit, filed on behalf of health care workers in Baton Rouge, seeks an injunction against Louisiana HB 388, which requires abortion providers in the state to obtain local hospital admitting privileges. . . .