Ms. magazine  -- more than a magazine a movement

SIGN UP FOR MS. DIGEST, JOBS, NEWS AND ALERTS

FEMINIST WIRE NEWSBRIEFS

ABOUT
SEE CURRENT ISSUE
SHOP MS. STORE
MS. IN THE CLASSROOM
FEMINIST DAILY WIRE
FEMINIST RESOURCES
PRESS
JOBS AT MS.
READ BACK ISSUES
CONTACT
RSS (XML)
 
feminist wire | daily newsbriefs

March-23-05

Dept. of Education Weakens Title IX Compliance Standards for College Athletics

Late last Friday afternoon, the Department of Education released a letter weakening the requirements of Part Three of the three-part test by which colleges and universities measure their compliance with Title IX, the 1972 federal law prohibiting sex discrimination at institutions receiving federal financial assistance for education programs and activities. Essentially the Bush Administration is trying to do by administrative fiat what a Bush athletic commission tried to do more publicly in 2003. Before the election, the Bush Department of Education rejected the commission’s recommendations and reaffirmed Title IX. Now, after the election, the Department of Education is trying to quietly, without public notice, weaken Title IX.

Released without advance notice, the letter informed schools with intercollegiate varsity sports that sending an email survey to female students asking them if there are any additional athletic opportunities they would like to have open to them is sufficient to prove that “the school is fully and effectively accommodating the interest and abilities of the underrepresented sex.” This is a change from policy guidance released in the past two decades by the Dept. of Education, specifically the 1996 guidelines which state that multiple indicators such as interviews with students, coaches, and faculty should be used to assess the athletic interests of the underrepresented sex.

The model email survey option, which shifts the burden to female students and requires them to be the impetus for equitable athletic opportunities, is inherently flawed and is not a valid interpretation of Title IX. The National Women’s Law Center contends that these email surveys will most likely reflect the discrimination in athletics that already exists against women and girls, stating that “women and girls might not express interest and ability in particular sports if they have not had the chance to play them.” Additionally, a survey sent only to students will not include the vital opinions and perspectives of the school’s coaches and administrators.

The Office for Civil Rights (OCR), which conducts compliance reviews “at its discretion,” reports that over two-thirds of colleges and universities analyzed between the years of 1992 and 2002 used the third option of the three-part test—which asks for proof that interests and abilities of female students are being met—to show that they were treating women fairly, instead of the other two options, based on actual percentages of female and male students and history of progress in complying with Title IX.

Dr. Sue Klein, Education Equity Director of the Feminist Majority Foundation, said, “The weakening of this widely used Part Three option by easing the requirements for compliance and by shifting the burden of proof to the underrepresented students is not consistent with the Department’s conciliatory 2003 Clarification letter issued after the extensive public outcry to similar unpopular recommendations by the Secretary’s Commission on Opportunities in Athletics.” Dr. Klein continued, saying, “This new letter is an ill-advised and inappropriate way to change an important civil rights policy that has helped advance gender equity in college athletics, a job that is still not completed.”

Currently young women make up 53 percent of the student body in Division One schools, yet they receive only 41 percent of the athletic opportunities, 36 percent of the athletic budgets, and 32 percent of the recruit

Media Resources: Dept of Education Letter 3/17/05; National Women’s Law Center memo and press release 3/21/05; New York Times 3/23/05; SaveTitleIX.com; Feminist Majority Foundation Education Equity website


© Feminist Majority Foundation, publisher of Ms. magazine

If you liked this story, consider making a tax-deductible donation to support Ms. magazine.

 

 

Send to a Friend
Their
Your
Comments
(optional)


More Feminist News

10/30/2014 Medication Abortion Access Threatened by Oklahoma Court Ruling - An Oklahoma state district court judge has refused to block a state law restricting medication abortion, clearing the way for the law to go into affect on November 1. The Oklahoma Coalition for Reproductive Justice, together with a local abortion clinic in Tulsa, challenged HB 2684 in September, arguing that the law was an unconstitutional restriction on non-surgical abortion in the earliest weeks of pregnancy. . . .
 
10/30/2014 UPS Switches Pregnant Worker Policy Ahead of Supreme Court Case - The United Parcel Service (UPS) is changing its policy on light duty assignments for pregnant workers, even though the company will stand by its refusal to extend accommodations to a former employee in an upcoming Supreme Court case. UPS announced on Monday in a memo to employees, and in a brief filed with the US Supreme Court, that the company will begin offering temporary, light-duty positions to pregnant workers on January 1, 2015. . . .
 
10/30/2014 North Dakota Medical Students Speak Out Against Measure 1 - Medical students at the University of North Dakota School of Medicine and Health Sciences are asking North Dakotans to vote no on Measure 1, a personhood measure on the state ballot this fall. The students issued published a letter in the Grand Forks Herald stating that they opposed Measure 1 in part because they are against "the government's taking control of the personal health care decisions of its citizens." Nearly 60 UND School of Medicine students signed the letter, citing concerns over the "very broad and ambiguous language" used in the proposed amendment, which has no regard for serious and life-threatening medical situations such as ectopic pregnancies. Measure 1 would change the North Dakota state constitution to create an "inalienable right to life" for humans "at any stage of development" - including the moment of fertilization and conception. . . .