Bush Nominates Anti-UN Candidate for Ambassador to the UN
Earlier this week, President Bush nominated John Bolton to be the United States Ambassador to the United Nations, angering women's rights and human rights advocates. According to Citizens for Global Solutions, Bolton has a history of hostility towards the United Nations, international law, and the International Criminal Court (ICC).
As President George W. Bush’s Undersecretary for Arms Control and International Security, Bolton spearheaded US opposition to the ICC, reports the Washington Post and even stated that the day he signed the letter taking away the US signature to the Rome Statute was “the happiest moment of my government service.” Bolton also opposed the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty, the international bio-weapons conference, the ban on chemical weapons and the nuclear test ban, according to Americans for Democratic Action.
Women’s rights advocates are extremely concerned about Bolton’s disregard of the ICC. The ICC has widespread support in the US from groups such as the Feminist Majority because it identifies gender crimes and the crime of apartheid as crimes against humanity. Article 7 of the Rome Statute, which created the court, presents clear language that defines rape, sexual slavery, enforced prostitution, forced pregnancy, enforced sterilization, or any other form of sexual violence of comparable gravity as gender crimes.
Media Resources: Associated Press 3/9/05; Americans for Democratic Action 3/9/05; Washington Post 3/8/05; Citizens for Global Solutions 3/7/05
7/1/2015 Women's Rights Activists are Suing the Kenyan Government for Reproductive Rights - A woman in Kenya is suing the Kenyan government for failure to provide safe and legal abortions, which caused her daughter - a 15-year-old rape victim - to suffer a kidney failure after undergoing the procedure illegally.
Currently, there are four petitioners on the case: the mother of the survivor, the Federation of Women Lawyers-Kenya, and two other women's rights advocates. . . .
6/30/2015 Supreme Court Ruling Prevents Gerrymandering in Arizona - In a 5-4 decision delivered by Justice Ginsburg this morning, the Supreme Court upheld Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission, allowing the use of independent state commissions that draw federal congressional districts, taking that power away from the state legislature.
This gives states an opportunity to deal with partisan gerrymandering by giving an independent commission power to draw federal congressional districts.
In 2000, Arizona voters amended their constitution, shifting the responsibility of drawing congressional districts, previously held by the state legislature, to a panel called the Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission. . . .