Abercrombie & Fitch Settles Class Action Lawsuit for $50 Million
Clothing retailer Abercrombie & Fitch recently settled a class action discrimination lawsuit, agreeing to pay $40 million to current, former, and prospective minority and women employees, as well as consenting to implement a multifaceted strategy to diversify its workforce. In addition, the company must pay $10 million to cover attorney fees and to monitor compliance, the Associated Press reports. The company was accused of employment practices that excluded or limited the participation of minorities and women and of conducting virtually all-white marketing campaigns. In addition to the 16 named plaintiffs, Shaheena Simons, attorney for the Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund, estimates that 20,000 to 50,000 others will file a claim to receive compensation for the discrimination they experienced as former employees or applicants, according to the New University newspaper of University of California-Irvine newspaper. The US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) joined the plaintiffs in a parallel lawsuit, arguing that Abercrombie & Fitch was in violation of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
According to the EEOC, the nationwide chain of clothing stores has agreed to hire a Vice President for Diversity, pursue “benchmarks” to ensure fair the hiring and promotion of minority and female employees, hire 25 new recruiters for the purpose of attaining a diverse staff, require diversity training for all Abercrombie & Fitch employees who have the authority to hire other staff members, include models from a wider range of ethnic groups in its catalogues and marketing materials, and create internal protocol to enable employees to lodge complaints of discrimination. However, under the terms of the settlement, the company was not required to admit any wrongdoing.
The class-action suit was a cooperative effort between several organizations, including the NAACP Legal and Educational Defense Fund, the Mexican American Legal and Educational Defense Fund, the Asian Pacific American Legal Center, and the Rainbow Push Coalition.
In 2002, Abercrombie & Fitch came under fire for a line of T-shirts with offensive slogans that stereotypically depicted Asian-Americans as cartoon-like figures with slanted eyes and conical hats. After protests erupted, according to the Associated Press, the line was pulled from the store’s shelves and website.
Media Resources: Los Angeles Times 11/28/04; New University 11/29/04; Rainbow Push Coalition Press Release 11/23/04; San Francisco Chronicle 4/18/02; Associated Press 4/18/04; EEOC 11/16/04; Associated Press 11/16/04
1/23/2015 #HeForShe Campaign Launches Pilot Effort Aimed at Institutional Equality - The United Nations' gender equality campaign #HeForShe has launched a new program called IMPACT 10X10X10.
United Nations Goodwill Ambassador Emma Watson, together with UN Women Executive DirectorPhumzile Mlambo-Ngcuka, introduced the one-year pilot effort aimed at encouraging corporations, universities, and governments to play an active role in enhancing women's empowerment and equality in Davos, Switzerland today at the World Economic Forum.
"Women need to be equal participants in our homes, societies, in our governments, and in our workplaces," Watson said.
First introduced in September, HeForShe is a solidarity movement that calls on men and boys to confront gender inequalities that face women and girls globally. . . .
1/22/2015 BREAKING: House to Vote on Abortion Coverage Ban - After they were forced to scrap plans for a 20-week abortion ban, House Republican leaders decided late last night to instead ram through a vote today on a different extreme anti-abortion bill.
House Republicans are now pushing HR 7, a bill promoted as a ban on federal funding of abortion that would actually prevent women from using their own money to purchase health insurance that includes abortion care. . . .
1/22/2015 House Cancels Abortion Ban After GOP Congresswomen Drop Support - House Republicans cancelled plans to vote on a 20-week ban on abortion after Republican Congresswomen removed their names publicly as co-sponsors of the bill.
The vote on the unconstitutional 20-week ban had originally been scheduled for today, the anniversary of Roe v. . . .