Ms. magazine  -- more than a magazine a movement

SIGN UP FOR MS. DIGEST, JOBS, NEWS AND ALERTS

FEMINIST WIRE NEWSBRIEFS

ABOUT
SEE CURRENT ISSUE
SHOP MS. STORE
MS. IN THE CLASSROOM
FEMINIST DAILY WIRE
FEMINIST RESOURCES
PRESS
JOBS AT MS.
READ BACK ISSUES
CONTACT
RSS (XML)
 
feminist wire | daily newsbriefs

November-12-04

Senate Hearings Set for Title IX Critic Nominated to DC Circuit Court

In an unorthodox move, Chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee Senator Orrin Hatch (R-UT) scheduled a hearing next week for the confirmation of Thomas Griffith during Congress’ lame-duck session. Griffith, an outspoken critic of Title IX, was nominated by President Bush last May to the DC Circuit Court of appeals, considered the second most powerful court in the country. The Washington Post reports that Senator Hatch, a proponent of Griffith’s, was eager to set the confirmation hearing before his committee chairmanship ends. Since Griffith’s nomination, controversy has arisen upon the discovery that he has been practicing law without a license in both the District and in Utah. This revelation is thought to have contributed to his receipt of the lowest possible passing grade by the American Bar Association in September.

Currently the senior legal counsel for Brigham Young University, Griffith was a member of the President's Commission on Opportunity in Athletics that recommended weakening enforcement of Title IX, the landmark 1972 law that prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex in education programs and activities that receive federal financial assistance. While on the Commission, Griffith proposed removing the proportionality test as one of the three criteria schools are required to meet to comply with Title IX athletics requirements. Griffith's proposal to remove this provision, critical to the effectiveness of Title IX in athletics, failed by a vote of 11-4. When asked by another commission member how his position stands up to the eight federal courts that have upheld the use of the proportionality test, Griffith replied, "They said it was a reasonable interpretation, not required. I believe they're wrong."

"Title IX has been instrumental in providing equal opportunities for women and girls in education, including sports. Such a detractor of equal opportunity in education must not be given this position of power to gut Title IX," warns FMF Education Equity Director Sue Klein. According to the American Association of University Women, there is reason for concern that, given his stance on Title IX, Griffith could also look unfavorably on cases involving policies that have a negative effect on women and minorities, employment discrimination, and affirmative action.

TAKE ACTION with the American Association of University Women to oppose Griffith’s nomination!

SIGN UP to receive important updates and action alerts from the Title IX Action Network

DONATE to support FMF’s work to achieve gender equality in education

Media Resources: Washington Post 11/12/04; American Association of University Women 11/12/04; Feminist Daily News Wire 5/12/04


© Feminist Majority Foundation, publisher of Ms. magazine

If you liked this story, consider making a tax-deductible donation to support Ms. magazine.

 

 

Send to a Friend
Their
Your
Comments
(optional)


More Feminist News

11/24/2014 The City of Louisville Has Overwhelmingly Approved a CEDAW Resolution - The city of Louisville, Kentucky approved a resolution that will use the UN Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW) as a framework for all future policy aimed at ending gender-based discrimination. Councilwoman Tina Ward-Pugh introduced the resolution, which passed overwhelmingly on November 6. . . .
 
11/24/2014 UVA President Suspends Greek Life Organizations After Revelation of Campus Rape Culture - University of Virginia President Teresa Sullivan announced on Saturday that all fraternities and sororities will be suspended until January 9 in the wake of several allegations of rape at the university. . . .
 
11/21/2014 Fifth Circuit Court Refuses to Reconsider Ruling Blocking Mississippi TRAP Law - The full US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit on Thursday refused to reconsider a panel decision blocking enforcement of a Mississippi law that threatened to close the last remaining abortion clinic in the state. In July, a panel of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a preliminary injunction against a Mississippi TRAP (Targeted Regulation of Abortion Providers) law requiring abortion providers to obtain admitting privileges at local hospitals. . . .