Ms. magazine  -- more than a magazine a movement

SIGN UP FOR MS. DIGEST, JOBS, NEWS AND ALERTS

FEMINIST WIRE NEWSBRIEFS

ABOUT
SEE CURRENT ISSUE
SHOP MS. STORE
MS. IN THE CLASSROOM
FEMINIST DAILY WIRE
FEMINIST RESOURCES
PRESS
JOBS AT MS.
READ BACK ISSUES
CONTACT
RSS (XML)
 
feminist wire | daily newsbriefs

July-14-04

Morgan Stanley Settles Sex-Bias Suit with $54 Million Out of Court

Faced with charges of sex discrimination in the workplace, Morgan Stanley agreed yesterday to pay a $54 million settlement rather than stand trial. The lawsuit, settled with the US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), came just minutes before an EEOC lawyer would have switched on a projector and displayed statistical evidence against the firm. Female employees claimed that the company systematically denied them equal pay and promotions, and excluded the women from meeting with clients, often setting up male-only functions at strip clubs and golf games, according to Bloomberg.com.

While Forbes.com notes that the $54 million settlement is merely a pittance for the Wall Street firm (representing just one day’s worth of revenue for Morgan Stanley), the EEOC win is the second biggest sex-bias settlement to date. Twelve million dollars of the settlement money will go to the lead plaintiff, Allison Schieffelin. Within 10 days, Morgan Stanley must contact all women who have worked for the company since 1995 and invite them to come forward and file claims. An estimated 340 female employees may file complaints, and an outside monitor will distribute $40 million of remaining settlement funds accordingly, reports The New York Times. Two million dollars have been reserved for diversity programs and anti-discrimination training to ensure future gender equity and success for women at Morgan Stanley, according to The New York Times.

Judge Richard M. Berman called the settlement “a watershed in safeguarding and promoting the rights of women on Wall Street,” according to The New York Times. Women currently comprise a “shrinking portion” of Wall Street employees, making up thirty-seven percent of the entire Wall Street workforce, down from 43 percent in 1999, according to Bloomberg.com.

Sexism and pay discrepancies extend from Wall Street firms to Middle-America Wal-Mart stores to Pennsylvania Avenue. Recent figures leaked from the White House reveal that women in the Bush administration earn about 78 percent of male employees’ salaries, due to the fact that men occupy 12 out of 17 top pay scale jobs and dominate high-end positions, according to The Washington Post.

JOIN the Feminist Majority and support our work for women’s equality

Media Resources: Forbes.com 7/13/04; Bloomberg.com 7/13/04; The New York Times 7/13/04; The Washington Post 7/13/04


© Feminist Majority Foundation, publisher of Ms. magazine

If you liked this story, consider making a tax-deductible donation to support Ms. magazine.

 

 

Send to a Friend
Their
Your
Comments
(optional)


More Feminist News

4/18/2014 Texas Hospitals Revoke Admitting Privileges to Abortion Providers - Reproductive health access in Texas continues to vanish in the wake of HB 2, the omnibus anti-abortion bill that, among other things, requires abortion providers to have admitting privileges in order to keep their clinics open. . . .
 
4/18/2014 Dartmouth President Calls For Changes In Wake of Federal Sexual Assault Investigation - Dartmouth College President Phil Hanlon gave a powerful speech Wednesday night calling for significant changes on campus in light of its high rates of sexual assault, high-risk drinking, and discriminatory social scene. "Darmouth's promise is being hijacked by high-risk and harmful behaviors, behaviors that are hurting too many of our students, dividing us as a community and distracting from our important work of teaching and learning," Hanlon said. . . .
 
4/17/2014 Federal Court Permanently Blocks North Dakota's Extreme 6-Week Abortion Ban - A federal district court permanently blocked one of the most restrictive abortion bans in the nation yesterday, calling it "invalid and unconstitutional." The North Dakota law, HB 1456, directly challenged Roe v. . . .