Ms. magazine  -- more than a magazine a movement

SIGN UP FOR MS. DIGEST, JOBS, NEWS AND ALERTS

FEMINIST WIRE NEWSBRIEFS

ABOUT
SEE CURRENT ISSUE
SHOP MS. STORE
MS. IN THE CLASSROOM
FEMINIST DAILY WIRE
FEMINIST RESOURCES
PRESS
JOBS AT MS.
READ BACK ISSUES
CONTACT
RSS (XML)
 
feminist wire | daily newsbriefs

May-17-04

Federal Court Dismisses Challenge to Title IX

A federal appeals court in Washington, DC on Friday dismissed a lawsuit alleging that Title IX, the landmark law prohibiting sex discrimination in federally funded education, threatens collegiate male sports teams. In the suit, the National Wrestling Coaches Association (NWCA) claimed that Title IX directly caused discriminatory reductions in men's sports when schools sought to create equal athletic opportunities for women. The three-judge panel said the parties lacked standing to file the lawsuit, which it said should be litigated against the colleges that eliminated men's sports and not the federal government, according to the Associated Press.

“Title IX’s athletic policies are about basic fairness – schools must give women and girls an equal chance to play sports and must treat men and women equally,” said National Women’s Law Center (NWLC) Senior Counsel Neena Chaudhry, who presented the oral argument in front of the US district court which previously heard the case. “While victories like this are steps in the right direction, too many women and girls still do not get the equal opportunities and benefits the law promises them… It’s time to put this fight to rest. The wrestlers have lost in every Court of Appeals that has considered their misguided argument that Title IX results in cuts to men’s teams,” said Chaudhry.

According to NWLC, 72 percent of colleges and universities have added women’s athletic teams to their offerings without eliminating any men’s teams. “Wrestlers should stop trying to pin the blame on female athletes and take on the real culprits – schools’ refusal to support both men’s and women’s teams and to cut bloated budgets,” said Chaudhry. According to the NWLC, women in Division I colleges are over half of the student body, but receive only 43 percent of athletic scholarship dollars, 32 percent of recruiting dollars, and 36 percent of operating budgets.

Mike Moyer, executive director of the NWCA, vowed that his group would appeal to the full appeals court, reports AP.

DONATE to the Feminist Majority Foundation and support our work to protect Title IX

Media Resources: Associated Press 5/14/04; National Women’s Law Center Release 5/14/04; Feminist Majority Foundation


© Feminist Majority Foundation, publisher of Ms. magazine

If you liked this story, consider making a tax-deductible donation to support Ms. magazine.

 

 

Send to a Friend
Their
Your
Comments
(optional)


More Feminist News

7/1/2015 Women's Rights Activists are Suing the Kenyan Government for Reproductive Rights - A woman in Kenya is suing the Kenyan government for failure to provide safe and legal abortions, which caused her daughter - a 15-year-old rape victim - to suffer a kidney failure after undergoing the procedure illegally. Currently, there are four petitioners on the case: the mother of the survivor, the Federation of Women Lawyers-Kenya, and two other women's rights advocates. . . .
 
6/30/2015 Community Members, Advocates, and Celebrities Stand in Support with Bree Newsome - On June 27, at about 6:30 AM, Bree Newsome scaled the flagpole at South Carolina's Statehouse and removed the confederate flag. . . .
 
6/30/2015 Supreme Court Ruling Prevents Gerrymandering in Arizona - In a 5-4 decision delivered by Justice Ginsburg this morning, the Supreme Court upheld Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission, allowing the use of independent state commissions that draw federal congressional districts, taking that power away from the state legislature. This gives states an opportunity to deal with partisan gerrymandering by giving an independent commission power to draw federal congressional districts. In 2000, Arizona voters amended their constitution, shifting the responsibility of drawing congressional districts, previously held by the state legislature, to a panel called the Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission. . . .