Ms. magazine  -- more than a magazine a movement

SIGN UP FOR MS. DIGEST, JOBS, NEWS AND ALERTS

FEMINIST WIRE NEWSBRIEFS

ABOUT
SEE CURRENT ISSUE
SHOP MS. STORE
MS. IN THE CLASSROOM
FEMINIST DAILY WIRE
FEMINIST RESOURCES
PRESS
JOBS AT MS.
READ BACK ISSUES
CONTACT
RSS (XML)
 
feminist wire | daily newsbriefs

February-26-04

SD: Bill to Ban Most Abortions Goes to Governor for Signature

A bill that would ban almost all abortions in South Dakota was passed by the state House on Wednesday. The bill, previously amended and passed by the state Senate, now goes to Governor Mike Rounds (R), sometime next week. Rounds has not indicated whether he will sign the bill, but he has previously stated that Roe was wrongly decided, and as a state senator his voting record was anti-abortion, according to the Boston Globe. If this bill does become law, it is expected to be face immediate legal challenges.

The bill defines life as beginning at conception. As it was originally written, it would have banned all abortions, with an exception only to save the life of the woman. The Senate amended the bill to allow abortions if a major bodily function of the woman was threatened, according to the Aberdeen News. The House retained this amendment in the final version of the bill. An amendment to add an exception for victims of rape or incest was narrowly defeated in the Senate. Under the bill, women who undergo illegal abortions would not be prosecuted, but physicians who perform them could be sentenced to up to five years in prison, according to Kaiser Daily Reproductive Health Report.

"In a bold maneuver, a vocal minority aggressively seeks to strip women in South Dakota of their basic reproductive rights," said Beth Jordan, MD, Medical Director of the Feminist Majority Foundation. "Not only are abortion rights being attacked, but contraception is as well. South Dakota even refuses to mandate that hospitals offer rape victims emergency contraception and further punishes its women by refusing, in this current bill, to sanction abortion even in cases of rape or incest."

The bill's author, Rep. Matt McCaulley (R-Sioux Falls), working with lawyers from the right-wing Thomas More Law Center in Michigan, hopes to use the bill to challenge Roe v. Wade. However, legal scholars believe such a challenge would be costly for South Dakota and ultimately unsuccessful. "This court is not going to overturn Roe," said University of Tulsa law professor and constitutional scholar Paul Finkelman, according to the Globe. "I don't think the votes are there." Political Science Professor Christopher Wolfe of Marquette University, who opposes legal abortion, believes that "until some of the justices on the court who support such abortion rights are replaced," Roe will remain intact, the Globe reports. Advocates on both sides of the abortion issue anticipate up to three Court vacancies in the next few years.

TAKE ACTION Sign up for the March for Women's Lives to sound the alarm about the threats facing abortion rights

DONATE to the Feminist Majority's March organizing work

Media Resources: Aberdeen News 2/25/04; Boston Globe 2/26/04; Kaiser Daily Reproductive Health Report 2/26/04; Argus Leader 2/26/04


© Feminist Majority Foundation, publisher of Ms. magazine

If you liked this story, consider making a tax-deductible donation to support Ms. magazine.

 

 

Send to a Friend
Their
Your
Comments
(optional)


More Feminist News

8/28/2015 Alaska Court Protects Abortion Access for Low-Income Women - The Alaska Superior Court struck down a state law yesterday that would have severely limited abortion access for low-income women in Alaska. The state's Superior Court also struck down a Department of Health and Social Services regulation that placed narrow specifications on Medicaid coverage for abortions, requiring that Medicaid-funded abortions be determined by a physician to be "medically necessary." Last year, the Center for Reproductive Rights, the American Civil Liberties Union, and Planned Parenthood sued on behalf of the Planned Parenthood of the Great Northwest, claiming that the narrow definition of "medically necessary" arbitrarily established conditions designed to restrict the ability of low-income women to access abortion services. The law was temporarily blocked last July by an Alaskan state court judge. Superior Court Judge John Suddock ordered yesterday that the state be blocked from implementing this regulation, ruling that it placed an undue burden on low-income women seeking abortion services in Alaska. "By providing health care to all poor Alaskans except women who need abortions, the challenged regulation violates the state constitutional guarantee of 'equal rights, opportunities, and protection under the law'," the ruling read. "We applaud the superior court for striing down these cruel restrictions on women's health and rights that violate the Alaska Constitution," said Chris Charbonneau, CEO of Planned Parenthood of the Great Northwest and the Hawaiian Islands. . . .
 
8/27/2015 Los Angeles Mayor Announces Model Gender Equity Directive - On Women's Equality Day Eric Garcetti, the Mayor of Los Angeles, signed a progressive and inclusive executive directive to take a major step toward gender equity for the city and to be a model for other cities. . . .
 
8/26/2015 Saudi Women Prepare to Vote for the First Time - The fight for gender equality is making slow but notable progress in Saudi Arabia, where women will be allowed to vote for the first time in upcoming December elections. This shift in Saudi law came in 2011, when a royal decree announced that women would be allowed to vote and run in local elections beginning in December of 2015. . . .