Ms. magazine  -- more than a magazine a movement

SIGN UP FOR MS. DIGEST, JOBS, NEWS AND ALERTS

FEMINIST WIRE NEWSBRIEFS

ABOUT
SEE CURRENT ISSUE
SHOP MS. STORE
MS. IN THE CLASSROOM
FEMINIST DAILY WIRE
FEMINIST RESOURCES
PRESS
JOBS AT MS.
READ BACK ISSUES
CONTACT
RSS (XML)
 
feminist wire | daily newsbriefs

July-18-03

House Cmte Votes to Block FCC Changes; Senators Introduce Congressional Veto

With a 40-25 vote, the House Appropriations Committee approved a bill that would keep the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) from implementing its recent decision to repeal media ownership rules and grant large corporations greater control of the media.

Specifically, the bill would keep the FCC from spending money to relax ownership limits on television stations - which would allow a single company to own TV stations that reach 45 percent of households in the US. Sponsored by David R. Obey (D-WI), the bill would effectively restore the previous limit of 35 percent, which was set in the 1996 Telecommunications Act, according to Congressional Quarterly Today.

With opposition from the House leadership and the White House, the bill faces considerable obstacles. However, public outcry against the issue has only grown - just 10 percent of those polled said that allowing companies to own more broadcast and newspaper operations in the same city would have a positive effect, according to a survey conducted by the Pew Research Center for the People & the Press. "We are hopeful that Congress is finally prepared to do what the FCC has refused to do," Gene Kimmelman, director of the Consumers Union, a leading group advocating against media consolidation, told CBS Market Watch.

Meanwhile, 35 Senators introduced a congressional veto of the new FCC rules - that would change the media ownership cap to allow a single company to own TV stations that reach 45 percent of households in the US; and would rewrite two existing "cross-ownership" rules to lift current restrictions that keep companies from owning a newspaper and a radio or TV station in the same market. The veto will next be considered by the full Senate. In addition, a Senate committee approved a version of the House bill last month.

TAKE ACTION Tell Congress to Overturn FCC's Rollback on Media Ownership

JOIN Become a member of the Ms. community and support independent press

Media Resources: Congressional Quarterly Today 7/16/03; Bloomberg 7/16/03; CBS Market Watch 7/16/03; Associated Press 7/13/03


© Feminist Majority Foundation, publisher of Ms. magazine

If you liked this story, consider making a tax-deductible donation to support Ms. magazine.

 

 

Send to a Friend
Their
Your
Comments
(optional)


More Feminist News

9/12/2014 Violence Against Women Act Turns 20 - Saturday will be the 20th Anniversary of the groundbreaking federal Violence Against Women Act (VAWA). Passed in 1994, VAWA was the first piece of federal legislation to specifically address domestic violence and sexual assault as crimes and to provide federal funding to improve local response to violence against women, including training and resources for law enforcement and judges. President Barack Obama on Tuesday issued a proclamation commemorating the VAWA anniversary. . . .
 
9/12/2014 Indiana Woman Charged With Feticide For Premature Delivery - An Indiana woman has been charged with feticide after she delivered prematurely and sought hospital treatment. Purvi Patel, 33, sought help at an emergency room for vaginal bleeding where it was discovered that she had delivered prematurely at home. . . .
 
9/11/2014 Missouri Legislators Pass 72-Hour Abortion Waiting Period Law - Missouri legislators voted late last night to triple the state's current 24-hour waiting period to 72 hours, with no exceptions for rape or incest. Governor Jay Nixon previously vetoed the bill in July, calling it "extreme and disrespectful." Missouri's House voted 117-44 to override the veto, and then the Senate used a procedural move to stop a Democratic filibuster of the bill and vote 23-7 to complete the veto override Wednesday. "The only purpose of a 72-hour waiting period is to attempt to punish, shame, and demean women who have arrived at a personal decision that politicians happen to disagree with," said the president and CEO of the Center for Reproductive Rights in a statement. . . .