Judiciary Committee Postpones Vote on Far-Right Extremist Nominee
In a move demonstrating discord over his nomination, the Senate Judiciary Committee postponed a vote scheduled for today on the nomination of far-right extremist William Pryor to the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals. Pryor, who continues to assert that Roe v. Wade is "the worst abomination of constitutional law in our history," is one of Bush's most troubling nominees in the President's continued efforts to stack the courts with far-right ideologues. Because the federal circuit courts are the court of last resort for 99 percent of federal cases, Pryor, only 41 years old, would have a lasting effect for generations to come as a lifetime appointee to what is already considered the most conservative circuit court in the country.
At his confirmation hearing last month, Pryor promised to set aside his personal and political views if confirmed. What Pryor's record indicates is that he translates these so-called personal political views into his judicial philosophy as well. Pryor is a leader in the states' rights movement, which advocates that the federal government not have the constitutional right to make or enforce laws protecting women's rights, civil rights, abortion rights, gay rights, and the environment. This movement argues that the courts should overturn such laws.
According to the Florida Sun-Sentinel, Pryor supporters argue he is controversial because he stands up for the Constitution as written and that judges should be challenging the "supposed" right to privacy, racial diversity and environmental protection. Further demonstrating that Pryor would not set aside such beliefs and that it is actually his goal to change the federal legal landscape, Pryor remarked the day after the US Supreme Court ruled 5-4 to resolve the 2000 presidential election saying, "I'm probably the only one who wanted it 5-4. I wanted (President-elect Bush) to have a full appreciation of the judiciary and judicial selection so we can have no more appointments like Justice [David] Souter." Justice Souter has drawn the ire of conservatives since being appointed to the court by Bush's father, according to the Sun-Sentinel.
The Feminist Majority joins a large coalition of women's rights, civil rights, environmental, church-state separation, disability, and lesbian and gay rights groups - including even the gay Republican Log Cabin group - in opposing Pryor.
10/30/2014 Medication Abortion Access Threatened by Oklahoma Court Ruling - An Oklahoma state district court judge has refused to block a state law restricting medication abortion, clearing the way for the law to go into affect on November 1.
The Oklahoma Coalition for Reproductive Justice, together with a local abortion clinic in Tulsa, challenged HB 2684 in September, arguing that the law was an unconstitutional restriction on non-surgical abortion in the earliest weeks of pregnancy. . . .
10/30/2014 UPS Switches Pregnant Worker Policy Ahead of Supreme Court Case - The United Parcel Service (UPS) is changing its policy on light duty assignments for pregnant workers, even though the company will stand by its refusal to extend accommodations to a former employee in an upcoming Supreme Court case.
UPS announced on Monday in a memo to employees, and in a brief filed with the US Supreme Court, that the company will begin offering temporary, light-duty positions to pregnant workers on January 1, 2015. . . .
10/30/2014 North Dakota Medical Students Speak Out Against Measure 1 - Medical students at the University of North Dakota School of Medicine and Health Sciences are asking North Dakotans to vote no on Measure 1, a personhood measure on the state ballot this fall.
The students issued published a letter in the Grand Forks Herald stating that they opposed Measure 1 in part because they are against "the government's taking control of the personal health care decisions of its citizens." Nearly 60 UND School of Medicine students signed the letter, citing concerns over the "very broad and ambiguous language" used in the proposed amendment, which has no regard for serious and life-threatening medical situations such as ectopic pregnancies.
Measure 1 would change the North Dakota state constitution to create an "inalienable right to life" for humans "at any stage of development" - including the moment of fertilization and conception. . . .