Ms. magazine  -- more than a magazine a movement

SIGN UP FOR MS. DIGEST, JOBS, NEWS AND ALERTS

FEMINIST WIRE NEWSBRIEFS

ABOUT
SEE CURRENT ISSUE
SHOP MS. STORE
MS. IN THE CLASSROOM
FEMINIST DAILY WIRE
FEMINIST RESOURCES
PRESS
JOBS AT MS.
READ BACK ISSUES
CONTACT
RSS (XML)
 
feminist wire | daily newsbriefs

June-25-03

Republicans Approve Proposal to Kill Filibusters on Nominees

In a move aimed at blocking filibusters of right-wing judges, the Senate Rules and Administration Committee approved yesterday a GOP leadership proposal to curtail filibusters on presidential nominations. With no Democrats present at the meeting, all 10 Republicans on the committee voted to approve Senator Bill Frist's (R-TN) proposal, S. Res.138, which gradually decreases the number of votes needed to overcome a filibuster on a presidential nominee.

In light of important federal appeals court vacancies and a rumored upcoming Supreme Court vacancy, partisan tensions are running high on this issue. Republicans claim that by blocking executive nominations, Democrats are creating a constitutional crisis. But Democrats argue that some of the President's nominees are so far to the right of mainstream America that they have no choice but to filibuster. Democrats have also pointed out that two filibustered judicial nominees hardly indicates a crisis when 131 have already been confirmed, according to the Washington Post.

Democrats denied that the absence of all nine Democratic committee members was a boycott, but indicated they would do everything in their power to stop the rules change, including filibustering it when it reaches the full Senate for a vote, the Post reported. Senator Frist did not say when he plans to bring the proposal to the floor for a vote, and in the closely divided Senate, he will most likely lack the 67 votes needed to pass the resolution. But he promised to keep pushing for the rules change and, if necessary, use "all avenues" to overcome the Democratic tactics he considers unconstitutional, the New York Times reported. Rules Committee Chair Trent Lott (R-MS) was even more confrontational. "We are going to find out," said Lott, "if we are men or mice sooner or later," according to the Times.

TAKE ACTION Urge the Senate Judiciary Committee to Reject the Nomination of Bill Pryor

CHAT Participate in the "Supreme Court in Peril" June chat series

DONATE Contribute to the Feminist Majority's campaign to protect abortion rights

Media Resources: New York Times 6/25/03; Washington Post 6/25/03


© Feminist Majority Foundation, publisher of Ms. magazine

If you liked this story, consider making a tax-deductible donation to support Ms. magazine.

 

 

Send to a Friend
Their
Your
Comments
(optional)


More Feminist News

10/31/2014 Federal Judge Exempts Another Catholic University from Birth Control Coverage - A federal judge ruled Tuesday that Ave Maria University, a Catholic university in Florida, does not have to comply with federal rules meant to ensure that covered employees can exercise their right to obtain birth control at no cost. The Affordable Care Act requires all new health insurance plans to cover all FDA-approved contraceptives - such as the pill, emergency contraceptives, and IUDs - without charging co-pays, deductibles or co-insurance. . . .
 
10/30/2014 Medication Abortion Access Threatened by Oklahoma Court Ruling - An Oklahoma state district court judge has refused to block a state law restricting medication abortion, clearing the way for the law to go into affect on November 1. The Oklahoma Coalition for Reproductive Justice, together with a local abortion clinic in Tulsa, challenged HB 2684 in September, arguing that the law was an unconstitutional restriction on non-surgical abortion in the earliest weeks of pregnancy. . . .
 
10/30/2014 UPS Switches Pregnant Worker Policy Ahead of Supreme Court Case - The United Parcel Service (UPS) is changing its policy on light duty assignments for pregnant workers, even though the company will stand by its refusal to extend accommodations to a former employee in an upcoming Supreme Court case. UPS announced on Monday in a memo to employees, and in a brief filed with the US Supreme Court, that the company will begin offering temporary, light-duty positions to pregnant workers on January 1, 2015. . . .