Ms. magazine  -- more than a magazine a movement

SIGN UP FOR MS. DIGEST, JOBS, NEWS AND ALERTS

FEMINIST WIRE NEWSBRIEFS

ABOUT
SEE CURRENT ISSUE
SHOP MS. STORE
MS. IN THE CLASSROOM
FEMINIST DAILY WIRE
FEMINIST RESOURCES
PRESS
JOBS AT MS.
READ BACK ISSUES
CONTACT
RSS (XML)
 
feminist wire | daily newsbriefs

June-25-03

Republicans Approve Proposal to Kill Filibusters on Nominees

In a move aimed at blocking filibusters of right-wing judges, the Senate Rules and Administration Committee approved yesterday a GOP leadership proposal to curtail filibusters on presidential nominations. With no Democrats present at the meeting, all 10 Republicans on the committee voted to approve Senator Bill Frist's (R-TN) proposal, S. Res.138, which gradually decreases the number of votes needed to overcome a filibuster on a presidential nominee.

In light of important federal appeals court vacancies and a rumored upcoming Supreme Court vacancy, partisan tensions are running high on this issue. Republicans claim that by blocking executive nominations, Democrats are creating a constitutional crisis. But Democrats argue that some of the President's nominees are so far to the right of mainstream America that they have no choice but to filibuster. Democrats have also pointed out that two filibustered judicial nominees hardly indicates a crisis when 131 have already been confirmed, according to the Washington Post.

Democrats denied that the absence of all nine Democratic committee members was a boycott, but indicated they would do everything in their power to stop the rules change, including filibustering it when it reaches the full Senate for a vote, the Post reported. Senator Frist did not say when he plans to bring the proposal to the floor for a vote, and in the closely divided Senate, he will most likely lack the 67 votes needed to pass the resolution. But he promised to keep pushing for the rules change and, if necessary, use "all avenues" to overcome the Democratic tactics he considers unconstitutional, the New York Times reported. Rules Committee Chair Trent Lott (R-MS) was even more confrontational. "We are going to find out," said Lott, "if we are men or mice sooner or later," according to the Times.

TAKE ACTION Urge the Senate Judiciary Committee to Reject the Nomination of Bill Pryor

CHAT Participate in the "Supreme Court in Peril" June chat series

DONATE Contribute to the Feminist Majority's campaign to protect abortion rights

Media Resources: New York Times 6/25/03; Washington Post 6/25/03


© Feminist Majority Foundation, publisher of Ms. magazine

If you liked this story, consider making a tax-deductible donation to support Ms. magazine.

 

 

Send to a Friend
Their
Your
Comments
(optional)


More Feminist News

9/12/2014 Violence Against Women Act Turns 20 - Saturday will be the 20th Anniversary of the groundbreaking federal Violence Against Women Act (VAWA). Passed in 1994, VAWA was the first piece of federal legislation to specifically address domestic violence and sexual assault as crimes and to provide federal funding to improve local response to violence against women, including training and resources for law enforcement and judges. President Barack Obama on Tuesday issued a proclamation commemorating the VAWA anniversary. . . .
 
9/12/2014 Indiana Woman Charged With Feticide For Premature Delivery - An Indiana woman has been charged with feticide after she delivered prematurely and sought hospital treatment. Purvi Patel, 33, sought help at an emergency room for vaginal bleeding where it was discovered that she had delivered prematurely at home. . . .
 
9/11/2014 Missouri Legislators Pass 72-Hour Abortion Waiting Period Law - Missouri legislators voted late last night to triple the state's current 24-hour waiting period to 72 hours, with no exceptions for rape or incest. Governor Jay Nixon previously vetoed the bill in July, calling it "extreme and disrespectful." Missouri's House voted 117-44 to override the veto, and then the Senate used a procedural move to stop a Democratic filibuster of the bill and vote 23-7 to complete the veto override Wednesday. "The only purpose of a 72-hour waiting period is to attempt to punish, shame, and demean women who have arrived at a personal decision that politicians happen to disagree with," said the president and CEO of the Center for Reproductive Rights in a statement. . . .