Ms. magazine  -- more than a magazine a movement

SIGN UP FOR MS. DIGEST, JOBS, NEWS AND ALERTS

FEMINIST WIRE NEWSBRIEFS

ABOUT
SEE CURRENT ISSUE
SHOP MS. STORE
MS. IN THE CLASSROOM
FEMINIST DAILY WIRE
FEMINIST RESOURCES
PRESS
JOBS AT MS.
READ BACK ISSUES
CONTACT
RSS (XML)
 
feminist wire | daily newsbriefs

June-24-03

Senate Committee Votes To Overturn FCC Ruling on Media Ownership

With bipartisan support, the Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee voted to send a bill to the floor that would overturn the Federal Communication Commission's recent decision to repeal media ownership rules and grant large corporations greater control of the media. "The people won today - this is a huge blow to media conglomerates," Gene Kimmelman, director of advocacy and public policy for Consumer's Union, a group that is part of a broad coalition working against the FCC's proposed changes, told TomPaine.com.

Sponsored by Sens. Ted Stevens (R-AK) and Ernest Hollings (D-SC), the bill approved by the Senate Committee would keep newspapers from owning television and radio stations in the same city, stop broadcast networks from buying more stations at local and national levels and force radio companies to give up some of their stations, according to the Washington Post.

The FCC ruling would allow changes in the media ownership cap to allow a single company to own TV stations that reach 45 percent of households in the US; and would rewrite two existing "cross-ownership" rules to lift current restrictions that keep companies from owning a newspaper and a radio or TV station in the same market. The FCC's decision was strongly opposed by the two Democratic commissioners - Michael Copps and Jonathan Adelstein - and met with widespread public opposition. FCC Chair Michael Powell championed the deregulation, which was approved in a 3-2 party line vote.

The legislation will likely face an uphill battle in the full Senate and in the House. Similar legislation currently moving through the House may be prevented from going to the floor by House Energy and Commerce Committee Chair Billy Tauzin (R-LA) and Appropriations Committee Chair Bill Young (R-FL), who support the FCC's ruling, according to the Post.

TAKE ACTION Ask the Senate to Overturn FCC's Rollback on Media Ownership

JOIN Become a member of the Ms. community and support independent media!

Media Resources: Associated Press 6/19/03; Washington Post 6/20/03; TomPaine.com 6/20/03


© Feminist Majority Foundation, publisher of Ms. magazine

If you liked this story, consider making a tax-deductible donation to support Ms. magazine.

 

 

Send to a Friend
Their
Your
Comments
(optional)


More Feminist News

9/12/2014 Violence Against Women Act Turns 20 - Saturday will be the 20th Anniversary of the groundbreaking federal Violence Against Women Act (VAWA). Passed in 1994, VAWA was the first piece of federal legislation to specifically address domestic violence and sexual assault as crimes and to provide federal funding to improve local response to violence against women, including training and resources for law enforcement and judges. President Barack Obama on Tuesday issued a proclamation commemorating the VAWA anniversary. . . .
 
9/12/2014 Indiana Woman Charged With Feticide For Premature Delivery - An Indiana woman has been charged with feticide after she delivered prematurely and sought hospital treatment. Purvi Patel, 33, sought help at an emergency room for vaginal bleeding where it was discovered that she had delivered prematurely at home. . . .
 
9/11/2014 Missouri Legislators Pass 72-Hour Abortion Waiting Period Law - Missouri legislators voted late last night to triple the state's current 24-hour waiting period to 72 hours, with no exceptions for rape or incest. Governor Jay Nixon previously vetoed the bill in July, calling it "extreme and disrespectful." Missouri's House voted 117-44 to override the veto, and then the Senate used a procedural move to stop a Democratic filibuster of the bill and vote 23-7 to complete the veto override Wednesday. "The only purpose of a 72-hour waiting period is to attempt to punish, shame, and demean women who have arrived at a personal decision that politicians happen to disagree with," said the president and CEO of the Center for Reproductive Rights in a statement. . . .