Bill Proposes Ending Tax Deductions for Discrimination
US Representatives Carolyn Maloney (D-NY14), Louise Slaughter (D-NY28) and Brad Sherman (D-CA27) joined together today to announce a new federal bill that would eliminate tax breaks for corporations that hold business conferences and meetings at male-exclusive clubs. The members of Congress were joined by Martha Burk, chair of the National Council for Women’s Organizations (NCWO), who is leading the fight against Augusta National, and Feminist Majority Vice President Kathy Spillar. “The American taxpayer should never pick up the tab for discrimination of any kind,” said Maloney in her press statement on the “Ending Tax Breaks for Discrimination Act of 2003,” also known as the Maloney-Sherman bill. “This bill sends the message that we are not stopping at Augusta. It is not about ending sexual discrimination at one club, it’s about ending sexual discrimination everywhere.” California, Colorado, and Kentucky have already enacted similar legislation.
Currently, the tax code permits business expense deductions for conventions, travel, accommodations, and advertising. In addition, deductions may also include expenses incurred while promoting and conducting business activities at private clubs, as well as 50 percent of business meals. There are more than 3,000 private clubs in the US, at least 24 of which are male-exclusive. Supporters of the Maloney-Sherman measure insist that government-subsidized discrimination is yet another example of how women are consistently excluded from major business decisions. Moreover, by entertaining at clubs that discriminate against women, corporations violate their own anti-discrimination and diversity policies.
Media Resources: Rep. Maloney press release and bill summary 6/11/03; Rep. Slaughter press release 6/11/03; Feminist Daily News Wire
10/30/2014 Medication Abortion Access Threatened by Oklahoma Court Ruling - An Oklahoma state district court judge has refused to block a state law restricting medication abortion, clearing the way for the law to go into affect on November 1.
The Oklahoma Coalition for Reproductive Justice, together with a local abortion clinic in Tulsa, challenged HB 2684 in September, arguing that the law was an unconstitutional restriction on non-surgical abortion in the earliest weeks of pregnancy. . . .
10/30/2014 UPS Switches Pregnant Worker Policy Ahead of Supreme Court Case - The United Parcel Service (UPS) is changing its policy on light duty assignments for pregnant workers, even though the company will stand by its refusal to extend accommodations to a former employee in an upcoming Supreme Court case.
UPS announced on Monday in a memo to employees, and in a brief filed with the US Supreme Court, that the company will begin offering temporary, light-duty positions to pregnant workers on January 1, 2015. . . .
10/30/2014 North Dakota Medical Students Speak Out Against Measure 1 - Medical students at the University of North Dakota School of Medicine and Health Sciences are asking North Dakotans to vote no on Measure 1, a personhood measure on the state ballot this fall.
The students issued published a letter in the Grand Forks Herald stating that they opposed Measure 1 in part because they are against "the government's taking control of the personal health care decisions of its citizens." Nearly 60 UND School of Medicine students signed the letter, citing concerns over the "very broad and ambiguous language" used in the proposed amendment, which has no regard for serious and life-threatening medical situations such as ectopic pregnancies.
Measure 1 would change the North Dakota state constitution to create an "inalienable right to life" for humans "at any stage of development" - including the moment of fertilization and conception. . . .