Burmese Women Suffer Systematic Rapes From Military
A new report reveals that Burma's army has been using rape as a weapon of war against ethnic women. The Washington-based Refugees International (RI) documented 43 rapes of women from the Karen, Karenni, Mon, Tavoyan and Shan ethnic groups. The US State Department found the report "appalling" and credible, according to the New York Times. Veronika Martin, one of the authors of the RI study No Safe Place: Burma's Army and the Rape of Ethnic Women, told the Times that "Women are raped during forced labor assignments, they are raped while farming, they are raped in their own homes and raped also when they are trying to flee to Thailand." The report found that almost one-third of the rapes were committed by higher-ranking officials, and in only two cases did the perpetrator receive even a minimum punishment.
The Burmese government has rejected the report and accused the US government of rehashing discredited allegations to attack it. But the State Department has said that its consulate in the northern Thai city of Chiang Mai had found evidence supporting the accusations, according to Agence France Presse. The State Department conduced its own interviews in three locations in December to confirm the allegations. Its investigators talked to 12 women who said they had been gang raped by Burmese soldiers during the past five years.
The State Department reported that "all of the victims under 15 appeared severely traumatized by their experiences, were disturbed mentally and spoke in whispers, if at all ... "The older women sobbed violently as they recalled horrific incidents of their own rapes as well as inhumane rapes, torture and execution of family members."
Refugees International has called on the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees to condemn rape and violence against ethnic women by the Burmese military and to insist that Thailand provide a safe haven for women fleeing rape and sexual violence in Burma.
Media Resources: RI report, press release 4/3/03; New York Times 5/12/03; Agence France Presse 4/4/03, 4/6/03 BBC News 4/8/03
10/31/2014 Federal Judge Exempts Another Catholic University from Birth Control Coverage - A federal judge ruled Tuesday that Ave Maria University, a Catholic university in Florida, does not have to comply with federal rules meant to ensure that covered employees can exercise their right to obtain birth control at no cost.
The Affordable Care Act requires all new health insurance plans to cover all FDA-approved contraceptives - such as the pill, emergency contraceptives, and IUDs - without charging co-pays, deductibles or co-insurance. . . .
10/31/2014 Women of Color in Tennessee Are United in Opposition to Amendment 1 - Just days before the general election in Tennessee, a coalition of community leaders, clergy, and advocates led a press conference encouraging women of color to vote no on Amendment 1, a dangerous and far-reaching measure on the state's ballot.
SisterReach, a grassroots organization focused on "empowering, organizing, and mobilizing women and girls in the community around their reproductive and sexual health to make informed decisions about themselves," organized the press conference "to call attention to the unique concerns Black and poor communities throughout Shelby County and across the state of Tennessee face on a daily basis" and to emphasize how the upcoming election "could further limit [black women's] reproductive, economic, political, and social autonomy."
"We assemble today to impress upon black women and women of color, many of whom are heads of households, to get out and vote," said SisterReacher Founder and CEO Cherisse Scott at the event.
SisterReach has been educating voters about the particularly dangerous impact of Amendment 1 on women of color. . . .
10/30/2014 Medication Abortion Access Threatened by Oklahoma Court Ruling - An Oklahoma state district court judge has refused to block a state law restricting medication abortion, clearing the way for the law to go into affect on November 1.
The Oklahoma Coalition for Reproductive Justice, together with a local abortion clinic in Tulsa, challenged HB 2684 in September, arguing that the law was an unconstitutional restriction on non-surgical abortion in the earliest weeks of pregnancy. . . .