Report, Bill Focus on Violence Against Women in Combat Areas
A new report by Save the Children ranks Afghanistan as the third worst combat area for families. The study identified six critical "protection needs" for women and children, including protection from sexual violence and physical harm, protection from trafficking and prostitution, and protection from psychological trauma. Iraq ranked 27th on the list of areas that have experiences war since 1990. "As dangerous as it has been for mothers and children in Iraq in recent months, life remains even more perilous for women and children in many other conflict areas," said Save the Children President Charles MacCormack, according to the Associated Press.
Lawmakers in Congress introduced the Women and Children in Armed Conflict Act yesterday to provide $45 million to prevent and respond to violence against women and children in conflict areas in the civilian population, according to Voice of America. "[T]he United States has not done nearly enough to coordinate efforts to respond to violence against women and children in [conflict] situations. This new legislation will make protection of women and children in war situations a much higher priority," said Sen. Joseph Biden (D-DE), one of the co-sponsors of the act, in a Save the Children press release.
Meanwhile, the US delegation at the United Nations' Commission on the Status of Women in March called for the deletion of important language in an agreement concerning violence against women. Specifically, the US, along with Iran, Pakistan, and the Sudan, objected to language stating that countries would agree to "condemn violence against women and refrain from invoking any custom, tradition, or religious consideration to avoid their obligations with respect to its elimination as set out in the Declaration on the Elimination of Violence Against Women," according to a press release from Rep. Carolyn Maloney (D-NY). This is not new language, but rather text that has been agreed upon in UN meetings, conferences and documents, according to Women's eNews. "It's remarkable to see that after decades of work by feminist activists and 12 years of UN conferences to see the ways that women's human rights are still seen as negotiable," Charlotte Bunch, executive director of Rutgers' Center for Women's Global leadership, told WeNews.
Media Resources: Save the Children press release 5/6/03; Carolyn Maloney press release 4/29/03; WeNews 4/24/03; Associated Press 5/6/03; Voice of America 5/6/03
10/30/2014 Medication Abortion Access Threatened by Oklahoma Court Ruling - An Oklahoma state district court judge has refused to block a state law restricting medication abortion, clearing the way for the law to go into affect on November 1.
The Oklahoma Coalition for Reproductive Justice, together with a local abortion clinic in Tulsa, challenged HB 2684 in September, arguing that the law was an unconstitutional restriction on non-surgical abortion in the earliest weeks of pregnancy. . . .
10/30/2014 UPS Switches Pregnant Worker Policy Ahead of Supreme Court Case - The United Parcel Service (UPS) is changing its policy on light duty assignments for pregnant workers, even though the company will stand by its refusal to extend accommodations to a former employee in an upcoming Supreme Court case.
UPS announced on Monday in a memo to employees, and in a brief filed with the US Supreme Court, that the company will begin offering temporary, light-duty positions to pregnant workers on January 1, 2015. . . .
10/30/2014 North Dakota Medical Students Speak Out Against Measure 1 - Medical students at the University of North Dakota School of Medicine and Health Sciences are asking North Dakotans to vote no on Measure 1, a personhood measure on the state ballot this fall.
The students issued published a letter in the Grand Forks Herald stating that they opposed Measure 1 in part because they are against "the government's taking control of the personal health care decisions of its citizens." Nearly 60 UND School of Medicine students signed the letter, citing concerns over the "very broad and ambiguous language" used in the proposed amendment, which has no regard for serious and life-threatening medical situations such as ectopic pregnancies.
Measure 1 would change the North Dakota state constitution to create an "inalienable right to life" for humans "at any stage of development" - including the moment of fertilization and conception. . . .