As crowds of students and activists gathered outside of the Supreme Court today, justices heard arguments in a case challenging the University of Michigan's affirmative action policy. The Court is hearing two related cases in which white student applicants charged they were unconstitutionally denied admission because of their race: Grutter v. Bollinger and Gratz v. Bollinger. The affirmative action policy has drawn wide support from a range of groups, including high-ranking military officials, Fortune 500 companies, and the civil and women's rights community. More than 100 amicus briefs have been filed in the case, including a brief from the Bush administration siding with the students.
The students were represented by attorneys from the conservative advocacy group Center for Individual Rights, which claims that Michiganís policy of using race as a factor in admissions violates Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, which prohibits racial discrimination by federally funded institutions, and/or the Constitution's 14th Amendment, which grants all citizens equal treatment under the law. The University of Michigan contends that its policy supports the creation of a diverse student body, which benefits all students, according to the Associated Press.
The Supreme Courtís last ruling regarding affirmative action, the 5-4 Bakke decision in 1978, upheld the use of race as a "plus factor" in admission but outlawed the use of "racial quotas." President Bush has consistently referred to Michiganís policy as "a quota system," mischaracterizing Michiganís more individualized policy that takes many factors into account, according to civil rights activist and lawyer Lani Guinier, writing in The Nation. "The strategy of the Administration is to 'quotify' any aspect of the admissions process that dares notice the race of applicants," Guinier says in The Nation. Two reports released last month found that alternatives to affirmative action, including the "race-neutral" policies supported by the Bush administration, are ineffective at promoting racial diversity.
Civil rights groups participated in a rally this morning at the Supreme Court, followed by a march to the Lincoln Memorial. Last night, students and community members at Howard University, a historically black university in Washington, DC, organized a rally that featured poets, scholars, activists, and policymakers speaking out for affirmative action.
Media Resources: Los Angeles Times 3/31/03; Associated Press 4/1/03; Christian Science Monitor 3/31/03; The Nation 2/10/03; Feminist Daily News Wire
10/13/2015 EEOC Launches Hollywood Gender Discrimination Probe - The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) has contacted several women directors in Hollywood in an effort to determine whether legal intervention is necessary to disrupt the industry's discriminatory hiring practices.
In a letter sent to some 50 women filmmakers, the EEOC - which is responsible for protecting individuals from employment discrimination based on sex, race, color, religion and national origin through enforcement of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 - requested interviews with them to "learn more about the gender-related issues" women behind the camera face in both the film and television industries.
In May, following the release of a study by the San Diego State University Center for the Study of Women in Television in Film revealing only 7 percent of 2014's 250 top-grossing movies were helmed by women, the ACLU of Southern California and the national ACLU Women's Rights Project urged state and federal rights agencies to investigate Hollywood's failure to hire equal numbers of women. . . .
10/12/2015 Report Finds Texas' HB2 Increases Abortion Wait Times - A new report released by the University of Texas at Austin, Texas Policy Evaluation Project found patients seeking abortions in Texas have experienced an increase in wait times since the passage of HB2, the 2013 Texas omnibus anti-abortion bill that attempts to cut off abortion access by requiring abortion providers in the state to fulfill medically unnecessary ambulatory surgical center requirements and secure hospital admitting privileges.
More than half of 42 clinics providing abortion in Texas have been forced to shut their doors since HB2 passed two years ago, leading Texas women to wait up to 20 days for a first consult at one of the surviving 18 reproductive health clinics operating in the state, the second most populous in the nation. . . .
10/9/2015 Federal Judge Orders Anti-Abortion Group to Cede Footage to NAF - On Tuesday, a federal judge ruled that anti-abortion group Center for Medical Progress (CMP) and its leader David Daleidan must turn over all previously unreleased "sting" videos and outtakes of National Abortion Federation (NAF) meetings the group obtained surreptitiously as part of a smear campaign against the abortion provider.
U.S. . . .