Ms. magazine  -- more than a magazine a movement

SIGN UP FOR MS. DIGEST, JOBS, NEWS AND ALERTS

FEMINIST WIRE NEWSBRIEFS

ABOUT
SEE CURRENT ISSUE
SHOP MS. STORE
MS. IN THE CLASSROOM
FEMINIST DAILY WIRE
FEMINIST RESOURCES
PRESS
JOBS AT MS.
READ BACK ISSUES
CONTACT
RSS (XML)
 
feminist wire | daily newsbriefs

February-24-03

Bush Commission Recommends Cutting Back on Women's Sports Opportunities

A draft of the Commission on Opportunity in Athletics' report on Title IX, published in an article in the Chronicle of Higher Education, ignores the continuing lack of participation opportunities and funding that women's and girls' athletics face in favor of recommendations that will increase males' participation in athletics. Title IX is the 1972 law that prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex in federally funded education, including athletic programs. The Chronicle also reports that "the report also uses language to describe how gender-equity guidelines have evolved that is very similar to language contained in a lawsuit filed against the Education Department by associations of coaches of men's sports like wrestling and swimming.”

The Commission suggested several sweeping changes to Title IX enforcement that will effectively eviscerate the gains women and girls have made in athletics. One recommendation, according to the Women's Sports Foundation, will result in the loss of thousands of participation opportunities for women in college and hundreds of thousands of opportunities for young women in high school. The Commission supported forcing women and girls to show that they are interested in sports before they are given the opportunity to play. The history of Title IX, however, clearly shows that it is lack of opportunity that limits the participation of women and girls in sports, not lack of interest. If given the chance, women and girls will play. Since Title IX, the number of young women participating in college sports has increased 400 percent and the number of young women participating in high school sports has increased 800 percent. Despite 30 years of struggle, women and girls are still not equal. Women and girls still have fewer athletic participation opportunities then men, receive less funding, receive less recruitment money, and are given inferior facilities.

Moreover, the Commission's decision to endorse men's sports over women's rests on the stereotypical belief that men are more naturally interested in sports and thus deserve more opportunities and resources. The same lack of interest and talent arguments were used to keep women out of higher education, math classes, and science classes. If its recommendations are accepted, the Commission’s government-sanctioned discrimination could spread throughout education.

The Commission's report will be officially presented to the Department of Education on Wednesday.

TAKE ACTION Tell the Commission to Preserve Title IX

Media Resources: Chronicle of Higher Education 2/20/03; Women's Sports Foundation; National Coalition of Women and Girls in Education (NCWGE); FMF


© Feminist Majority Foundation, publisher of Ms. magazine

If you liked this story, consider making a tax-deductible donation to support Ms. magazine.

 

 

Send to a Friend
Their
Your
Comments
(optional)


More Feminist News

10/31/2014 Federal Judge Exempts Another Catholic University from Birth Control Coverage - A federal judge ruled Tuesday that Ave Maria University, a Catholic university in Florida, does not have to comply with federal rules meant to ensure that covered employees can exercise their right to obtain birth control at no cost. The Affordable Care Act requires all new health insurance plans to cover all FDA-approved contraceptives - such as the pill, emergency contraceptives, and IUDs - without charging co-pays, deductibles or co-insurance. . . .
 
10/31/2014 Women of Color in Tennessee Are United in Opposition to Amendment 1 - Just days before the general election in Tennessee, a coalition of community leaders, clergy, and advocates led a press conference encouraging women of color to vote no on Amendment 1, a dangerous and far-reaching measure on the state's ballot. SisterReach, a grassroots organization focused on "empowering, organizing, and mobilizing women and girls in the community around their reproductive and sexual health to make informed decisions about themselves," organized the press conference "to call attention to the unique concerns Black and poor communities throughout Shelby County and across the state of Tennessee face on a daily basis" and to emphasize how the upcoming election "could further limit [black women's] reproductive, economic, political, and social autonomy." "We assemble today to impress upon black women and women of color, many of whom are heads of households, to get out and vote," said SisterReacher Founder and CEO Cherisse Scott at the event. SisterReach has been educating voters about the particularly dangerous impact of Amendment 1 on women of color. . . .
 
10/30/2014 Medication Abortion Access Threatened by Oklahoma Court Ruling - An Oklahoma state district court judge has refused to block a state law restricting medication abortion, clearing the way for the law to go into affect on November 1. The Oklahoma Coalition for Reproductive Justice, together with a local abortion clinic in Tulsa, challenged HB 2684 in September, arguing that the law was an unconstitutional restriction on non-surgical abortion in the earliest weeks of pregnancy. . . .