Ms. magazine  -- more than a magazine a movement

SIGN UP FOR MS. DIGEST, JOBS, NEWS AND ALERTS

FEMINIST WIRE NEWSBRIEFS

ABOUT
SEE CURRENT ISSUE
SHOP MS. STORE
MS. IN THE CLASSROOM
FEMINIST DAILY WIRE
FEMINIST RESOURCES
PRESS
JOBS AT MS.
READ BACK ISSUES
CONTACT
RSS (XML)
 
feminist wire | daily newsbriefs

February-13-03

Special Report: Democratic and Republican Senators, Afghan Ambassador Call for Peace Force Expansion

At a hearing before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Democratic and Republican Senators criticized the Bush Administration for "sugarcoating" the situation in Afghanistan and expressed grave concerns that the US is not providing adequate commitment, resources, and security support for Afghanistan.

Committee Chairman Senator Richard Lugar (R-IN) opened the hearing with a call for US "follow through" in Afghanistan and for expansion of the International Security Assistance Force (ISAF), which currently has 4,800 peace keeping troops in Kabul, to areas outside of the capital. Said Lugar, "I agree with those who suggest that ISAF must expand its area of operations beyond the capital. The need to maintain security, distribute aid, and establish the credibility of the interim government exists throughout the country, not just in Kabul."

Throughout the hearing, the senators pressed the State Department's Afghanistan Coordinator David Johnson and Assistant Secretary of Defense for International Security Affairs Peter Rodman, who testified before the Committee, on why the US has refused to commit with other nations to expand ISAF. The ranking Democrat on the Committee, Senator Joseph Biden (D-DE) said that “security [in Afghanistan] is jeopardized by the
Administration’s refusal to support ISAF expansion.”

Both Republican and Democratic Senators also challenged the Department of Defense’s plan to deploy small provincial regional teams to 7-10 areas of Afghanistan over the next year as a substitute for ISAF expansion. The teams, which would vary in size from 10 to 60 people, would include special operations, civil affairs, and USAID personnel. Said Lugar, the teams "cannot fully compensate for the value of expanded ISAF." Senator Jon
Corzine (D-NJ) questioned whether the size of the teams would enable them to provide adequate protection for women¹s rights and human rights.

Biden also expressed concern that the Bush Administration had redefined what constitutes security and stability in Afghanistan from the "mandate of a central government controlling all of Afghanistan that is multi-ethnic and violence-free" to the lesser standard of "lack of violence." Biden stated that warlords, drugs, terrorism, and the influence of other countries in the region would continue to pose dangerous threats to Afghanistan¹s central government and the country’s stability unless the US made greater commitments. He cited Herat warlord Kahn's imposition of restrictions on women and asked if "that's stability?"

Senators of both parties also called for full appropriation of funds for the newly passed Afghan Freedom Support Act, which provides $3.3 billion in reconstruction and security assistance for Afghanistan. Senator Chuck Hagel (R-NE), the Act's chief sponsor, repeatedly asked the Department of Defense’s Rodman how much of their new $6.1 billion budget request would go for Afghanistan's reconstruction and expressed frustration that Rodman would not answer the question.

At the hearing, Afghanistan's Ambassador the United States Ishaq Shahryar, also called for the U.S. to support expansion of ISAF beyond Kabul and an increase in the force's size to at least 15,000 troops, to fund the Afghan Freedom Support Act, to provide reconstruction funding directly through the central Afghan government, and to encourage the return of Afghan exiles to the country.

The Feminist Majority has been leading the call for ISAF expansion and increases in reconstruction funding and particularly for more resources to support the work of the Ministry of Women's Affairs and the Human Rights Commission.

TAKE ACTION Media Resources: Feminist Majority Foundation; Associated Press 2/12/03; Reuters 2/12/03; New York Times 2/13/03


© Feminist Majority Foundation, publisher of Ms. magazine

If you liked this story, consider making a tax-deductible donation to support Ms. magazine.

 

 

Send to a Friend
Their
Your
Comments
(optional)


More Feminist News

10/30/2014 Medication Abortion Access Threatened by Oklahoma Court Ruling - An Oklahoma state district court judge has refused to block a state law restricting medication abortion, clearing the way for the law to go into affect on November 1. The Oklahoma Coalition for Reproductive Justice, together with a local abortion clinic in Tulsa, challenged HB 2684 in September, arguing that the law was an unconstitutional restriction on non-surgical abortion in the earliest weeks of pregnancy. . . .
 
10/30/2014 UPS Switches Pregnant Worker Policy Ahead of Supreme Court Case - The United Parcel Service (UPS) is changing its policy on light duty assignments for pregnant workers, even though the company will stand by its refusal to extend accommodations to a former employee in an upcoming Supreme Court case. UPS announced on Monday in a memo to employees, and in a brief filed with the US Supreme Court, that the company will begin offering temporary, light-duty positions to pregnant workers on January 1, 2015. . . .
 
10/30/2014 North Dakota Medical Students Speak Out Against Measure 1 - Medical students at the University of North Dakota School of Medicine and Health Sciences are asking North Dakotans to vote no on Measure 1, a personhood measure on the state ballot this fall. The students issued published a letter in the Grand Forks Herald stating that they opposed Measure 1 in part because they are against "the government's taking control of the personal health care decisions of its citizens." Nearly 60 UND School of Medicine students signed the letter, citing concerns over the "very broad and ambiguous language" used in the proposed amendment, which has no regard for serious and life-threatening medical situations such as ectopic pregnancies. Measure 1 would change the North Dakota state constitution to create an "inalienable right to life" for humans "at any stage of development" - including the moment of fertilization and conception. . . .