War in Iraq Could Increase Violence in Afghanistan
The commander of the international peacekeeping forces in Afghanistan issued a warning today that a US-led war in Iraq could mean increased terrorism in Afghanistan, according to the Washington Post. Major General Hilmi Akin Zorlu of Turkey, commander of the International Security Assistance Force (ISAF), told the Post that “if there is a war in Iraq, there might be many sympathizers in Afghanistan. It may cause an increase in terrorist actions against all foreigners including ISAF, UN, coalition forces and all civilian businessmen coming to Afghanistan.”
There has already been an increase in violence toward aid agencies in one of Afghanistan’s poorest provinces, Zabul. Reuters reports that there has been a series of armed robberies and a grenade attack on aid agencies in the area in the past week alone. Zabul’s governor blamed the attacks on members of the former Taliban. The increased violence is forcing many of the aid groups to consider leaving the province if their security could not be guaranteed, according to Reuters. Several of the 12 known attacks on girls’ schools occurred in Zabul, indicating that security in the region has been deteriorating for the past few months, and fundamentalist forces have been active in the area. President Bush signed the Afghan Freedom Support Act last month, which provides for $2.3 billion in humanitarian and reconstruction aid and $1 billion to expand ISAF. It is now crucial that Congress appropriates the funds provided for by this Act.
In related news, the United Nations estimates that a war in Iraq could displace as many as 10 million Iraqi citizens, including more than 2 million refugees and homeless who are in need of immediate assistance because of their high risk of hunger and disease, according to the Post. The confidential document was made public by a student advocacy group at Cambridge University, Campaign Against Sanctions in Iraq. Dated December 10, 2002, the document states that “the bulk of the population [of Iraq] is now totally dependent on the Government of Iraq for a majority, if not all, of their basic needs and, unlike the situation in 1991, they have no way of coping if they cannot access them: the sanctions regime, if anything, has served to increase dependence on the Government as almost the sole provider.”
Media Resources: Washington Post 1/7/03; BBC 1/7/03; Reuters 1/7/03; UN document 12/10/02; Feminist Daily News Wire
10/30/2014 Medication Abortion Access Threatened by Oklahoma Court Ruling - An Oklahoma state district court judge has refused to block a state law restricting medication abortion, clearing the way for the law to go into affect on November 1.
The Oklahoma Coalition for Reproductive Justice, together with a local abortion clinic in Tulsa, challenged HB 2684 in September, arguing that the law was an unconstitutional restriction on non-surgical abortion in the earliest weeks of pregnancy. . . .
10/30/2014 UPS Switches Pregnant Worker Policy Ahead of Supreme Court Case - The United Parcel Service (UPS) is changing its policy on light duty assignments for pregnant workers, even though the company will stand by its refusal to extend accommodations to a former employee in an upcoming Supreme Court case.
UPS announced on Monday in a memo to employees, and in a brief filed with the US Supreme Court, that the company will begin offering temporary, light-duty positions to pregnant workers on January 1, 2015. . . .
10/30/2014 North Dakota Medical Students Speak Out Against Measure 1 - Medical students at the University of North Dakota School of Medicine and Health Sciences are asking North Dakotans to vote no on Measure 1, a personhood measure on the state ballot this fall.
The students issued published a letter in the Grand Forks Herald stating that they opposed Measure 1 in part because they are against "the government's taking control of the personal health care decisions of its citizens." Nearly 60 UND School of Medicine students signed the letter, citing concerns over the "very broad and ambiguous language" used in the proposed amendment, which has no regard for serious and life-threatening medical situations such as ectopic pregnancies.
Measure 1 would change the North Dakota state constitution to create an "inalienable right to life" for humans "at any stage of development" - including the moment of fertilization and conception. . . .