Ms. magazine  -- more than a magazine a movement

SIGN UP FOR MS. DIGEST, JOBS, NEWS AND ALERTS

FEMINIST WIRE NEWSBRIEFS

ABOUT
SEE CURRENT ISSUE
SHOP MS. STORE
MS. IN THE CLASSROOM
FEMINIST DAILY WIRE
FEMINIST RESOURCES
PRESS
JOBS AT MS.
READ BACK ISSUES
CONTACT
RSS (XML)
 
feminist wire | daily newsbriefs

January-02-03

Civil Rights Group Urges New Senate Leader to Keep Promises

A civil rights coalition group sent a letter on Tuesday to newly elected Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist (R-TN) urging him to keep his promise to “heal the wounds of division” opened up by outgoing Majority Leader Trent Lott (R-MS). The Leadership Conference on Civil Rights (LCCR), which represents more than 180 organizations, including the Feminist Majority, asked Frist to make civil rights a real priority for the Republican-led Senate when it reconvenes. Among other important goals, LCCR wants Frist to oppose judicial nominees who do not have a commitment to civil rights, preserve equal opportunity for women and girls in athletics by protecting Title IX, and ensure fairness in the criminal justice system and immigration. The letter was signed by Wade Henderson, LCCR executive director, and Dr. Dorthy Height, LCCR chair.

“We are hoping [the Lott controversy] has created a greater awareness and an opportunity to work with both Republicans and Democrats on human rights issues and civil liberties,” Nancy Zirkin, LCCR public policy director, told the Washington Post. But, she added, it “remains to be seen” whether Congress members’ attitudes towards civil rights have really changed, the Post reports. Lott stepped down as Majority Leader after being widely chastised for making racist remarks at a birthday celebration for retiring Senator Strom Thurmond. Frist, a retired heart surgeon, is close to President Bush and key presidential aides, including political strategist Karl Rove.

Frist’s record on civil rights and women's rights does little to suggest a change in Republican policies. Planned Parenthood’s Action Fund gave Frist a zero percent rating for voting against choice in eight key issues, including emergency contraception, the global gag rule, and sex education. The National Organization for Women notes that his record on civil rights is no better than Lott’s, with Frist voting against affirmative action, hate crimes legislation, and the Employment Non-Discrimination Act. According to the Post, the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) gave Frist an “F” rating for voting against civil rights measures 75 percent of the time. LCCR gave him a 0 percent rating on civil rights issues in their latest Congressional scorecard.

Media Resources: LCCR letter text 12/30/02; Washington Post 12/30/02, 12/23/02; USA Today 12/30/02; Feminist Daily News Wire


© Feminist Majority Foundation, publisher of Ms. magazine

If you liked this story, consider making a tax-deductible donation to support Ms. magazine.

 

 

Send to a Friend
Their
Your
Comments
(optional)


More Feminist News

7/23/2014 UConn to Pay Over $1.2 Million in Sexual Assault Settlement - The University of Connecticut (UConn) will pay $1.28 million in settlement fees for a sexual assault lawsuit brought against the university by five sexual assault survivors. The federal lawsuit was brought by five women after four of the women had filed complaints with the Department of Education (ED) alleging that UConn had mishandled rape cases and failed to take action on reports of harassment, in violation of Title IX. . . .
 
7/23/2014 100 Days Vigils Held To Support Rescue of Kidnapped Nigerian Schoolgirls - 100 days ago today, more than 270 schoolgirls were kidnapped in Nigeria by Boko Haram. . . .
 
7/22/2014 Louisiana Pro-Choice Community Stands Up Against Operation Rescue - Saturday, Operation Rescue/Operation Save America launched an aggressive week-long siege against reproductive health clinics and abortion care providers in southern Louisiana. The annual siege is expected to run through Saturday, July 26, but already, several dozen Operation Rescue protesters have moved these forceful assemblies to doctors' private residences, riling neighbors in the process with their megaphones, explicit and invasive signage. . . .