WHO, Others Mark International Day for Elimination of Violence Against Women
After releasing a study in October that for the first time called violence against women a global health problem, the World Health Organization (WHO) has launched a campaign to prevent violence against women through public education. The WHO timed its campaign to begin on the United Nations’ International Day for the Elimination of Violence Against Women on November 25. The WHO report emphasizes the role that such gender-based violence as intimate partner abuse and sexual assault can play in women’s health, as well as their economic status. The WHO found that nearly half of all women who are victims of homicide are killed by a current or former husband or boyfriend, and that in some countries, up to 47 percent of women report that the first time they had sex, it was forced.
Also launched on Nov. 25 was a worldwide campaign for women’s human rights organized by the Center for Women’s Global Leadership called “16 Days of Activism Against Gender Violence.” Between Nov. 25 and Dec. 10, which is International Human Rights Day, groups around the world will raise awareness about gender-based violence as a human rights issue. The theme of this year’s campaign is “Creating a Culture that Says No to Violence Against Women.”
UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan released a statement to mark the International Day for the Elimination of Violence Against Women, citing the International Criminal Court (ICC) as one way the international community is dealing with violence against women. The ICC has been soundly rejected by the Bush Administration, with President Bush going so far as to unsign the Rome Statute establishing the ICC, which was signed by former President Clinton but not ratified by the Senate. The ICC has widespread support among developed nations, as well as within the US from groups such as the Feminist Majority because it identifies gender crimes and apartheid as crimes against humanity. Article 7 of the Rome Statute presents clear language that defines rape, sexual slavery, enforced prostitution, forced pregnancy, enforced sterilization, and any other form of sexual violence of comparable gravity as gender crimes.
The Convention to Eliminate all forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW), the international women’s rights treaty, is another tool against gender-based violence that the US Senate has refused to ratify since former President Carter signed it over 20 years ago. It was finally approved by the Senate Foreign Relations Committee in August, but it has not yet received a vote on the Senate floor.
Media Resources: UNIFEM release 11/26/02; UN Secretary-General release 11/12/02; WHO release 11/25/02; Amnesty International; Center for Women’s Global Leadership; Feminist Daily News Wire
8/31/2015 Chicago Activists Continue Hunger Strike to Save Predominately Black Public High School - Chicago residents have entered the second week of their hunger strike protesting the closure of Dyett High School, in the predominately African-American Bronzeville neighborhood located on the South Side of Chicago.
Parents and community members are calling on the Chicago Board of Education to keep Dyett - the only open-enrollment, neighborhood school in its area - open and accept a community plan to revitalize the school with a focus on science and green technology. . . .
8/28/2015 Alaska Court Protects Abortion Access for Low-Income Women - The Alaska Superior Court struck down a state law yesterday that would have severely limited abortion access for low-income women in Alaska.
The state's Superior Court also struck down a Department of Health and Social Services regulation that placed narrow specifications on Medicaid coverage for abortions, requiring that Medicaid-funded abortions be determined by a physician to be "medically necessary." Last year, the Center for Reproductive Rights, the American Civil Liberties Union, and Planned Parenthood sued on behalf of the Planned Parenthood of the Great Northwest, claiming that the narrow definition of "medically necessary" arbitrarily established conditions designed to restrict the ability of low-income women to access abortion services.
The law was temporarily blocked last July by an Alaskan state court judge.
Superior Court Judge John Suddock ordered yesterday that the state be blocked from implementing this regulation, ruling that it placed an undue burden on low-income women seeking abortion services in Alaska.
"By providing health care to all poor Alaskans except women who need abortions, the challenged regulation violates the state constitutional guarantee of 'equal rights, opportunities, and protection under the law'," the ruling read.
"We applaud the superior court for striing down these cruel restrictions on women's health and rights that violate the Alaska Constitution," said Chris Charbonneau, CEO of Planned Parenthood of the Great Northwest and the Hawaiian Islands. . . .