Ms. magazine  -- more than a magazine a movement

SIGN UP FOR MS. DIGEST, JOBS, NEWS AND ALERTS

FEMINIST WIRE NEWSBRIEFS

ABOUT
SEE CURRENT ISSUE
SHOP MS. STORE
MS. IN THE CLASSROOM
FEMINIST DAILY WIRE
FEMINIST RESOURCES
PRESS
JOBS AT MS.
READ BACK ISSUES
CONTACT
RSS (XML)
 
feminist wire | daily newsbriefs

December-03-02

Supreme Court Will Hear Affirmative Action Cases

The Supreme Court on Monday agreed to hear two related affirmative action cases involving the University of Michigan and white student applicants charging they were unconstitutionally denied admission because of their race. Attorneys from the advocacy group Center for Individual Rights allege that Michigan’s policy of accepting minorities over whites having equal or higher grades and scores violates Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, which prohibits racial discrimination by federally funded institutions, and/or the Constitution’s 14th Amendment, which grants all citizens equal treatment under the law. However, Michigan President Mary Sue Coleman argues that race is critical to developing a diverse educational environment offering benefits to all, according to the Washington Post. More over, “Now is not the time to turn back the clock… The color of your skin determines so many important things about your life experience—where you live, where you go to work and with whom you work. Race still matters in our society. The ideal of colorblindness does not mean we can or should be blind to that reality.”

Previous rulings on affirmative action have only heightened the controversy. In the 1978 Supreme Court case involving Allan Bakke, a white student denied admission to the University of California at Davis’ medical school, justices ruled 5-4 to prohibit racial quotas but permit consideration of race in developing student diversity. In the Michigan cases to be heard by the Supreme Court next year--Gratz v. Bollinger and Grutter v. Bollinger--a US district judge upheld the university’s undergraduate admissions practice but struck down its law school policy, respectively. Both cases were appealed to the US 6th Circuit Court of Appeals. Last May, the appeals court ruled by a narrow 5-4 margin in favor of Michigan’s law school, but no ruling has yet been issued in the undergraduate case. The Supreme Court is expected to hear arguments for both cases in March and issue a decision by July.

Minorities account for roughly 15 percent of Michigan’s freshman law students, according to the Associated Press.

Media Resources: Washington Post 12/3/02; Associated Press 12/2/02; CNN 12/3/02; University of Michigan press release 12/2/02


© Feminist Majority Foundation, publisher of Ms. magazine

If you liked this story, consider making a tax-deductible donation to support Ms. magazine.

 

 

Send to a Friend
Their
Your
Comments
(optional)


More Feminist News

11/21/2014 STATEMENT: Feminist Majority Foundation Applauds President's Executive Order on Immigration - Statement from Eleanor Smeal, Feminist Majority Foundation president: "The Feminist Majority Foundation applauds President Obama for taking much needed executive action to help fix our broken immigration system that has for too long torn hardworking families apart. . . .
 
11/21/2014 Fifth Circuit Court Refuses to Reconsider Ruling Blocking Mississippi TRAP Law - The full US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit on Thursday refused to reconsider a panel decision blocking enforcement of a Mississippi law that threatened to close the last remaining abortion clinic in the state. In July, a panel of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a preliminary injunction against a Mississippi TRAP (Targeted Regulation of Abortion Providers) law requiring abortion providers to obtain admitting privileges at local hospitals. . . .
 
11/21/2014 UN Expert Calls for Action To End Violence Against Women in Afghanistan - United Nations Special Rapporteur on Violence against Women Rashida Manjoo returned last week from a nine-day official visit in Afghanistan with a call to the Afghan Government and the international community to continue its focus on creating sustainable solutions to reduce violence against women. This was Manjoo's third visit to Afghanistan, and the Special Rapporteur noted many positive developments since her travel to the country in 1999, during the Taliban regime, and in 2005. In particular, Manjoo cited the creation of the Elimination of Violence Against Women Law (EVAW) by presidential decree in 2009 as "a key step towards the elimination of violence against women and girls."EVAW criminalizes 22 acts of violence against women - including rape, child and forced marriage, domestic violence, trafficking, and forced self-immolation - and specifies punishment for perpetrators. . . .