Ms. magazine  -- more than a magazine a movement

SIGN UP FOR MS. DIGEST, JOBS, NEWS AND ALERTS

FEMINIST WIRE NEWSBRIEFS

ABOUT
SEE CURRENT ISSUE
SHOP MS. STORE
MS. IN THE CLASSROOM
FEMINIST DAILY WIRE
FEMINIST RESOURCES
PRESS
JOBS AT MS.
READ BACK ISSUES
CONTACT
RSS (XML)
 
feminist wire | daily newsbriefs

December-03-02

Supreme Court Will Hear Affirmative Action Cases

The Supreme Court on Monday agreed to hear two related affirmative action cases involving the University of Michigan and white student applicants charging they were unconstitutionally denied admission because of their race. Attorneys from the advocacy group Center for Individual Rights allege that Michigan’s policy of accepting minorities over whites having equal or higher grades and scores violates Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, which prohibits racial discrimination by federally funded institutions, and/or the Constitution’s 14th Amendment, which grants all citizens equal treatment under the law. However, Michigan President Mary Sue Coleman argues that race is critical to developing a diverse educational environment offering benefits to all, according to the Washington Post. More over, “Now is not the time to turn back the clock… The color of your skin determines so many important things about your life experience—where you live, where you go to work and with whom you work. Race still matters in our society. The ideal of colorblindness does not mean we can or should be blind to that reality.”

Previous rulings on affirmative action have only heightened the controversy. In the 1978 Supreme Court case involving Allan Bakke, a white student denied admission to the University of California at Davis’ medical school, justices ruled 5-4 to prohibit racial quotas but permit consideration of race in developing student diversity. In the Michigan cases to be heard by the Supreme Court next year--Gratz v. Bollinger and Grutter v. Bollinger--a US district judge upheld the university’s undergraduate admissions practice but struck down its law school policy, respectively. Both cases were appealed to the US 6th Circuit Court of Appeals. Last May, the appeals court ruled by a narrow 5-4 margin in favor of Michigan’s law school, but no ruling has yet been issued in the undergraduate case. The Supreme Court is expected to hear arguments for both cases in March and issue a decision by July.

Minorities account for roughly 15 percent of Michigan’s freshman law students, according to the Associated Press.

Media Resources: Washington Post 12/3/02; Associated Press 12/2/02; CNN 12/3/02; University of Michigan press release 12/2/02


© Feminist Majority Foundation, publisher of Ms. magazine

If you liked this story, consider making a tax-deductible donation to support Ms. magazine.

 

 

Send to a Friend
Their
Your
Comments
(optional)


More Feminist News

10/30/2014 Medication Abortion Access Threatened by Oklahoma Court Ruling - An Oklahoma state district court judge has refused to block a state law restricting medication abortion, clearing the way for the law to go into affect on November 1. The Oklahoma Coalition for Reproductive Justice, together with a local abortion clinic in Tulsa, challenged HB 2684 in September, arguing that the law was an unconstitutional restriction on non-surgical abortion in the earliest weeks of pregnancy. . . .
 
10/30/2014 UPS Switches Pregnant Worker Policy Ahead of Supreme Court Case - The United Parcel Service (UPS) is changing its policy on light duty assignments for pregnant workers, even though the company will stand by its refusal to extend accommodations to a former employee in an upcoming Supreme Court case. UPS announced on Monday in a memo to employees, and in a brief filed with the US Supreme Court, that the company will begin offering temporary, light-duty positions to pregnant workers on January 1, 2015. . . .
 
10/30/2014 North Dakota Medical Students Speak Out Against Measure 1 - Medical students at the University of North Dakota School of Medicine and Health Sciences are asking North Dakotans to vote no on Measure 1, a personhood measure on the state ballot this fall. The students issued published a letter in the Grand Forks Herald stating that they opposed Measure 1 in part because they are against "the government's taking control of the personal health care decisions of its citizens." Nearly 60 UND School of Medicine students signed the letter, citing concerns over the "very broad and ambiguous language" used in the proposed amendment, which has no regard for serious and life-threatening medical situations such as ectopic pregnancies. Measure 1 would change the North Dakota state constitution to create an "inalienable right to life" for humans "at any stage of development" - including the moment of fertilization and conception. . . .