The Supreme Court on Monday agreed to hear two related affirmative action cases involving the University of Michigan and white student applicants charging they were unconstitutionally denied admission because of their race. Attorneys from the advocacy group Center for Individual Rights allege that Michigan’s policy of accepting minorities over whites having equal or higher grades and scores violates Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, which prohibits racial discrimination by federally funded institutions, and/or the Constitution’s 14th Amendment, which grants all citizens equal treatment under the law. However, Michigan President Mary Sue Coleman argues that race is critical to developing a diverse educational environment offering benefits to all, according to the Washington Post. More over, “Now is not the time to turn back the clock… The color of your skin determines so many important things about your life experience—where you live, where you go to work and with whom you work. Race still matters in our society. The ideal of colorblindness does not mean we can or should be blind to that reality.”
Previous rulings on affirmative action have only heightened the controversy. In the 1978 Supreme Court case involving Allan Bakke, a white student denied admission to the University of California at Davis’ medical school, justices ruled 5-4 to prohibit racial quotas but permit consideration of race in developing student diversity. In the Michigan cases to be heard by the Supreme Court next year--Gratz v. Bollinger and Grutter v. Bollinger--a US district judge upheld the university’s undergraduate admissions practice but struck down its law school policy, respectively. Both cases were appealed to the US 6th Circuit Court of Appeals. Last May, the appeals court ruled by a narrow 5-4 margin in favor of Michigan’s law school, but no ruling has yet been issued in the undergraduate case. The Supreme Court is expected to hear arguments for both cases in March and issue a decision by July.
Minorities account for roughly 15 percent of Michigan’s freshman law students, according to the Associated Press.
Media Resources: Washington Post 12/3/02; Associated Press 12/2/02; CNN 12/3/02; University of Michigan press release 12/2/02
2/27/2015 This Bipartisan Bill Will Hold Colleges Accountable for Ending Campus Sexual Assault - A bipartisan bill aimed at holding colleges and universities accountable for rape and sexual assault cases was introduced in Congress yesterday, spearheaded by Senator Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY).
Some of the Campus Accountability and Safety Act's key key provisions include a requirement of confidential reporting systems on colleges and universities, minimum training requirements for campus personnel, and stricter penalties for schools found to be in violation of Title IX or the Clery Act. . . .
2/26/2015 If This Bill Passes Federal Law Will Add Consent to Sex Ed Curriculums - Right now, federal law does not require health or sex education to include sexual assault prevention - but that could change with a new bill introduced by Senators Claire McCaskill (D-MO) and Tim Kaine (D-VA).
The Teach Safe Relationships Act of 2015, which was introduced earlier this month, would require all public secondary schools in the country to include teaching "safe relationship behavior" in order to help prevent domestic violence and sexual assault. . . .