Fundamentalist Religious Forces in Pakistan Fare Well in Elections
Opponents of Pakistan’s President Pervez Musharraf, including Islamic fundamentalists and secular groups, fared well in the national elections last week. Political analysts worry that this will make it more difficult General Musharraf to crack down on Islamic extremists on the border of Pakistan and Afghanistan, according to the New York Times.
A group of six Muslim fundamentalist parties with anti-American platforms had their strongest showing ever since 1993. They won at least 49 parliamentary seats, making them the third largest voting block in the assembly. These religious parties have strong support in the Northwest Frontier Province and the southwestern Baluchistan Province, both of which border Afghanistan and are suspected to be havens for Taliban and Al Qaeda fighters. The group’s secretary general, Munnawar Hasan, stated in an interview with Reuters, “We will stop the ongoing pursuit of Taliban and Al Qaeda when we form a government. We will go by the rule of law. Taliban and Al Qaeda members are our brothers.”
In 1999, when General Musharraf seized power by a coup, many Pakistanis supported his overthrow of what they saw as a corrupt government. However, Musharraf’s current support of the United States and the war against terrorism has created tensions between Musharraf and many fundamentalists in Pakistan. Musharraf retains almost absolute power over Pakistan, including complete control over the army and the power to dissolve the new Parliament at will, despite his claims to be moving to a more democratic rule, according to the Times.
Media Resources: New York Times 10/11/2002, 10/12/2002, Associated Press 10/11/2002; Reuters 10/11/02
8/28/2015 Alaska Court Protects Abortion Access for Low-Income Women - The Alaska Superior Court struck down a state law yesterday that would have severely limited abortion access for low-income women in Alaska.
The state's Superior Court also struck down a Department of Health and Social Services regulation that placed narrow specifications on Medicaid coverage for abortions, requiring that Medicaid-funded abortions be determined by a physician to be "medically necessary." Last year, the Center for Reproductive Rights, the American Civil Liberties Union, and Planned Parenthood sued on behalf of the Planned Parenthood of the Great Northwest, claiming that the narrow definition of "medically necessary" arbitrarily established conditions designed to restrict the ability of low-income women to access abortion services.
The law was temporarily blocked last July by an Alaskan state court judge.
Superior Court Judge John Suddock ordered yesterday that the state be blocked from implementing this regulation, ruling that it placed an undue burden on low-income women seeking abortion services in Alaska.
"By providing health care to all poor Alaskans except women who need abortions, the challenged regulation violates the state constitutional guarantee of 'equal rights, opportunities, and protection under the law'," the ruling read.
"We applaud the superior court for striing down these cruel restrictions on women's health and rights that violate the Alaska Constitution," said Chris Charbonneau, CEO of Planned Parenthood of the Great Northwest and the Hawaiian Islands. . . .
8/26/2015 Saudi Women Prepare to Vote for the First Time - The fight for gender equality is making slow but notable progress in Saudi Arabia, where women will be allowed to vote for the first time in upcoming December elections.
This shift in Saudi law came in 2011, when a royal decree announced that women would be allowed to vote and run in local elections beginning in December of 2015. . . .