Support Group for Victims of Priest Abuse Fights Subpoena
The victims support group SNAP (Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests) has vowed to fight a subpoena that they argue is meant to intimidate and harass victims of sexual abuse by priests, according to the Boston Globe. Lawyers for the Catholic Diocese of Worcester in Massachusetts have subpoenaed the leaders of SNAP, seeking information about five women who filed a civil lawsuit against the diocese for failing to protect them against convicted rapist and priest Robert E. Kelley, as well as the names of “all persons” who have alleged abuse by Kelley, according to the Associated Press.
Wendy Murphy, the lawyer representing the women in the lawsuit, argues that the case against Kelley is strong enough without the names of persons alleging abuse who are not involved in the lawsuit, the Globe reports. In addition, SNAP leaders worry that victims of sexual abuse will not feel comfortable taking part in a support group if their names could then be exposed without their consent, according to the Globe. Paul Baier of Voice of the Faithful, a group of lay Catholics that formed earlier this year at the beginning of the priest sex abuse scandal, also expressed to the Globe his worries that if this subpoena is successful, it may jeopardize the work of other confidential victim support groups, such as rape crisis centers and domestic violence shelters.
Kelley spent several years in prison after pleading guilty to charges of rape in 1990, and he has admitted to sexual abuse of 50 to 100 girls 20 years ago, according to the Associated Press. Though he has not been active in the Church since 1986, he has not been defrocked. Although media reports of priest abuse in the past year have focused on male victims, some experts estimate that as many as half of all victims are women, according to the Kansas City Star.
Media Resources: Boston Globe 9/22/02; Associated Press 9/22/02; Kansas City Star 7/12/02
10/31/2014 Federal Judge Exempts Another Catholic University from Birth Control Coverage - A federal judge ruled Tuesday that Ave Maria University, a Catholic university in Florida, does not have to comply with federal rules meant to ensure that covered employees can exercise their right to obtain birth control at no cost.
The Affordable Care Act requires all new health insurance plans to cover all FDA-approved contraceptives - such as the pill, emergency contraceptives, and IUDs - without charging co-pays, deductibles or co-insurance. . . .
10/31/2014 Women of Color in Tennessee Are United in Opposition to Amendment 1 - Just days before the general election in Tennessee, a coalition of community leaders, clergy, and advocates led a press conference encouraging women of color to vote no on Amendment 1, a dangerous and far-reaching measure on the state's ballot.
SisterReach, a grassroots organization focused on "empowering, organizing, and mobilizing women and girls in the community around their reproductive and sexual health to make informed decisions about themselves," organized the press conference "to call attention to the unique concerns Black and poor communities throughout Shelby County and across the state of Tennessee face on a daily basis" and to emphasize how the upcoming election "could further limit [black women's] reproductive, economic, political, and social autonomy."
"We assemble today to impress upon black women and women of color, many of whom are heads of households, to get out and vote," said SisterReacher Founder and CEO Cherisse Scott at the event.
SisterReach has been educating voters about the particularly dangerous impact of Amendment 1 on women of color. . . .
10/30/2014 Medication Abortion Access Threatened by Oklahoma Court Ruling - An Oklahoma state district court judge has refused to block a state law restricting medication abortion, clearing the way for the law to go into affect on November 1.
The Oklahoma Coalition for Reproductive Justice, together with a local abortion clinic in Tulsa, challenged HB 2684 in September, arguing that the law was an unconstitutional restriction on non-surgical abortion in the earliest weeks of pregnancy. . . .