Ms. magazine  -- more than a magazine a movement

SIGN UP FOR MS. DIGEST, JOBS, NEWS AND ALERTS

FEMINIST WIRE NEWSBRIEFS

ABOUT
SEE CURRENT ISSUE
SHOP MS. STORE
MS. IN THE CLASSROOM
FEMINIST DAILY WIRE
FEMINIST RESOURCES
PRESS
JOBS AT MS.
READ BACK ISSUES
CONTACT
RSS (XML)
 
feminist wire | daily newsbriefs

September-19-02

Anti-Women Judicial Nominee Does Little To Appease Critics In Senate Committee Hearing

Michael McConnell consistently tried to distance himself from his anti-women’s rights and anti-civil rights writings during a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing yesterday on his nomination to a lifetime seat on the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals. A University of Utah law professor who has written extensively about his opposition to a woman’s right to choose, McConnell attempted to convince the committee that he would follow the legal precedent outlined in Roe v. Wade despite the fact that his writings indicate otherwise.

Several Democratic members of the committee, the Feminist Majority and other women’s rights, civil rights and progressive groups were not convinced. “McConnell has openly stated that he believes that Roe v. Wade is unconstitutional. Members of the Senate Judiciary Committee must continue to send President Bush the message that they will not approve judges that will take away women’s rights and roll the clock backwards according to a right-wing ideology,” said Eleanor Smeal, president of the Feminist Majority.

Sen. Charles Schumer (D-NY) questioned McConnell about writings in which he praised a judge for disregarding the Federal Access to Clinic Entrances Act (FACE). After listening to Schumer’s explanation that the law was enacted in response to a tactic in which abortion opponents shut down clinics with their nonviolent protests (anti-abortion extremists also often use violence to accomplish the same goal), McConnell stated that Schumer had made “powerful points he had not considered when he wrote the article,” according to the New York Times.

McConnell also backtracked on a statement he had made criticizing a Supreme Court decision to repeal Bob Jones University’s tax-exempt status for racially discriminatory policies. Yesterday, he noted that the federal government should in fact penalize institutions for racial discrimination, the Times reported.

Despite his appalling record on a variety of issues, some Democrats have indicated that they could approve McConnell’s nomination in exchange for a deal from the White House to nominate more moderate judges, according to Kaiser Daily Reproductive Health Report. McConnell only needs one Democratic vote in order for his nomination to move to the full Senate for consideration.

McConnell is the third in a string of right-wing activists nominated to lifelong federal bench positions by President Bush. Both Priscilla Owen and Charles Pickering, nominated to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, were rejected by the Senate Judiciary Committee for their propensity to trumpet their own right-wing ideologies over the law. If confirmed by the Senate, McConnell would become a lifetime appointee to the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals – the court of last resort for Colorado, Kansas, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Utah, and Wyoming.

Media Resources: New York Times 9/19/02; Associated Press 9/18/02; Kaiser Daily Reproductive Health Report 9/19/02; FoxNews.com 9/8/02


© Feminist Majority Foundation, publisher of Ms. magazine

If you liked this story, consider making a tax-deductible donation to support Ms. magazine.

 

 

Send to a Friend
Their
Your
Comments
(optional)


More Feminist News

8/28/2015 Alaska Court Protects Abortion Access for Low-Income Women - The Alaska Superior Court struck down a state law yesterday that would have severely limited abortion access for low-income women in Alaska. The state's Superior Court also struck down a Department of Health and Social Services regulation that placed narrow specifications on Medicaid coverage for abortions, requiring that Medicaid-funded abortions be determined by a physician to be "medically necessary." Last year, the Center for Reproductive Rights, the American Civil Liberties Union, and Planned Parenthood sued on behalf of the Planned Parenthood of the Great Northwest, claiming that the narrow definition of "medically necessary" arbitrarily established conditions designed to restrict the ability of low-income women to access abortion services. The law was temporarily blocked last July by an Alaskan state court judge. Superior Court Judge John Suddock ordered yesterday that the state be blocked from implementing this regulation, ruling that it placed an undue burden on low-income women seeking abortion services in Alaska. "By providing health care to all poor Alaskans except women who need abortions, the challenged regulation violates the state constitutional guarantee of 'equal rights, opportunities, and protection under the law'," the ruling read. "We applaud the superior court for striing down these cruel restrictions on women's health and rights that violate the Alaska Constitution," said Chris Charbonneau, CEO of Planned Parenthood of the Great Northwest and the Hawaiian Islands. . . .
 
8/27/2015 Los Angeles Mayor Announces Model Gender Equity Directive - On Women's Equality Day Eric Garcetti, the Mayor of Los Angeles, signed a progressive and inclusive executive directive to take a major step toward gender equity for the city and to be a model for other cities. . . .
 
8/26/2015 Saudi Women Prepare to Vote for the First Time - The fight for gender equality is making slow but notable progress in Saudi Arabia, where women will be allowed to vote for the first time in upcoming December elections. This shift in Saudi law came in 2011, when a royal decree announced that women would be allowed to vote and run in local elections beginning in December of 2015. . . .