Ms. magazine  -- more than a magazine a movement

SIGN UP FOR MS. DIGEST, JOBS, NEWS AND ALERTS

FEMINIST WIRE NEWSBRIEFS

ABOUT
SEE CURRENT ISSUE
SHOP MS. STORE
MS. IN THE CLASSROOM
FEMINIST DAILY WIRE
FEMINIST RESOURCES
PRESS
JOBS AT MS.
READ BACK ISSUES
CONTACT
RSS (XML)
 
feminist wire | daily newsbriefs

August-29-02

States Prosecute Priests for Sex Abuse Going Back Several Decades

Prosecutors in several states are working around the statute of limitations on sexual abuse cases in order to prosecute priests for child molestation and rape that occurred over the past several decades, according to the New York Times. This week, five priests were arrested in Detroit and Boston using a loophole that “stops the clock” when suspects move out of state, the Times reports. Other state legislatures, including Colorado and Connecticut, have lengthened the period of time in which abuse victims can file civil suits against their alleged abusers.

California Governor Gray Davis recently signed a law that allows victims of childhood abuse to file charges against third parties who knew of the abuse and did nothing for up to three years after discovering any psychological damage. In addition, the Times reports that Davis also signed a law suspending the statute of limitations for one year, which is expected to lead to many lawsuits for abuse by priests that occurred over the past several decades.

Four Detroit priests were charged using a loophole in the statute of limitations – all four left or have been removed from the ministry; one was voluntarily defrocked in the early 1990s. However, Michael Duggan, a prosecutor for Wayne County, Michigan, told the Detroit News that while there was evidence against 15 other Detroit priests, he was unable to charge them because of the statute of limitations.

One of the four priests, Robert Burkholder, now 82 and a resident of Oahu, Hawaii, admitted to abusing children throughout his years as a priest - starting from his ordination in 1947, according to the Detroit News. “The boys work in the rectory with the priest and you just get friendly. You sit down in the rectory and have a Coke. It’s a mutual deal. An affectionate thing and a friendly thing,” he said, according to the Times. He also said that he mostly fondled boys that he abused but sometimes had oral sex with them, claiming his relationships with the boys were “always a two-way thing,” the Times reported.

Media Resources: New York Times 8/29/02; Detroit News 8/28/02; Feminist Daily News Wire 7/15/02


© Feminist Majority Foundation, publisher of Ms. magazine

If you liked this story, consider making a tax-deductible donation to support Ms. magazine.

 

 

Send to a Friend
Their
Your
Comments
(optional)


More Feminist News

9/12/2014 Violence Against Women Act Turns 20 - Saturday will be the 20th Anniversary of the groundbreaking federal Violence Against Women Act (VAWA). Passed in 1994, VAWA was the first piece of federal legislation to specifically address domestic violence and sexual assault as crimes and to provide federal funding to improve local response to violence against women, including training and resources for law enforcement and judges. President Barack Obama on Tuesday issued a proclamation commemorating the VAWA anniversary. . . .
 
9/12/2014 Indiana Woman Charged With Feticide For Premature Delivery - An Indiana woman has been charged with feticide after she delivered prematurely and sought hospital treatment. Purvi Patel, 33, sought help at an emergency room for vaginal bleeding where it was discovered that she had delivered prematurely at home. . . .
 
9/11/2014 Missouri Legislators Pass 72-Hour Abortion Waiting Period Law - Missouri legislators voted late last night to triple the state's current 24-hour waiting period to 72 hours, with no exceptions for rape or incest. Governor Jay Nixon previously vetoed the bill in July, calling it "extreme and disrespectful." Missouri's House voted 117-44 to override the veto, and then the Senate used a procedural move to stop a Democratic filibuster of the bill and vote 23-7 to complete the veto override Wednesday. "The only purpose of a 72-hour waiting period is to attempt to punish, shame, and demean women who have arrived at a personal decision that politicians happen to disagree with," said the president and CEO of the Center for Reproductive Rights in a statement. . . .