Ms. magazine  -- more than a magazine a movement

SIGN UP FOR MS. DIGEST, JOBS, NEWS AND ALERTS

FEMINIST WIRE NEWSBRIEFS

ABOUT
SEE CURRENT ISSUE
SHOP MS. STORE
MS. IN THE CLASSROOM
FEMINIST DAILY WIRE
FEMINIST RESOURCES
PRESS
JOBS AT MS.
READ BACK ISSUES
CONTACT
RSS (XML)
 
feminist wire | daily newsbriefs

June-24-02

US Still Seeking ICC Exemption for Peacekeepers

The United States submitted a draft Security Council resolution insisting that contributing states—not the International Criminal Court (ICC)—have exclusive responsibility for investigating and prosecuting crimes allegedly committed by their nationals during their peacekeeping missions, during discussions last week to extend the United Nations Mission in Bosnia and Herzegovina (UNMIBH). The draft resolution states: that peacekeepers “shall enjoy in the territory of all member states other than the contributing state immunity from arrest, detention, and prosecution with respect to all acts arising out of the operation, and … this immunity shall continue after termination of their participation in the operation,” according to the UN Wire. The United States has threatened to withdraw its 712 troops from UN peacekeeping missions if demands are not met, according to Reuters. No one in the 15-member council agrees with the US position. According to Richard Dicker of Human Rights Watch: “Peacekeepers are protected by status of forces’ immunity agreements that are standard to all UN peacekeeping agreements, which say national courts have exclusive jurisdiction over their national soldiers. So any US personnel in a UN Security Council-mandated mission are already protected and under the exclusive authority of US courts.” The UN Security Council last month defeated a similar resolution submitted by the US at the UN Mission of Support in East Timor (UNMISET).

Sixty-seven nations have ratified the Rome Statute, the treaty establishing the ICC. The Court enters into force July 1. Last week, several European nations with troops in Afghanistan, received written assurances that their troops serving as peacekeepers would be immune from arrest or surrender to the ICC, according to the Washington Post. This agreement put the US and its allies sharply at odds with Bush’s proposal to exclude personnel in all UN missions from the reach of the ICC, according to the Post. For the past several months, the Feminist Majority and other women’s organizations as well as the United Nations and the interim Afghan government have asked the Bush administration to expand US peacekeeping troops in order to protect the Afghan people.

TAKE ACTION Tell the Bush Administration: Afghanistan Needs Peacekeeping Troops and Aid for Rebuilding

Media Resources: Reuters 6/19/02; UN Wire 6/20/02; Washington Post 6/20/02


© Feminist Majority Foundation, publisher of Ms. magazine

If you liked this story, consider making a tax-deductible donation to support Ms. magazine.

 

 

Send to a Friend
Their
Your
Comments
(optional)


More Feminist News

5/26/2015 Ireland Votes Overwhelmingly to Legalize Same-Sex Marriage - Over the weekend, the people of Ireland voted overwhelmingly to pass a national referendum legalizing same-sex marriage. Ireland became the first country in the world to pass marriage equality through popular vote on Friday. . . .
 
5/26/2015 Maryland Governor Will Not Veto LGBT Rights Bills - Maryland Governor Larry Hogan (R) has announced that he will not veto two pieces of legislation protecting LGBT rights passed by the state legislature in March, meaning they will soon become law. The Maryland General Assembly passed SB 743 / HB 862 and SB 416 / HB 838 by wide margins and with bipartisan support on March 24, after which both were sent to the Governor's desk. . . .
 
5/22/2015 Senate Votes to Advance "Fast Tracking" of Dangerous Trade Agreement - The US Senate voted 62 to 38 yesterday to advance "fast track" trade legislation, just one week after Senate Democrats filibustered the controversial bill that would allow President Obama to force Congress to vote up-or-down on the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) agreement. The TPP is a far-reaching trade agreement that has faced staunch opposition from a broad coalition of labor, environmental, women's rights, and human rights groups. . . .