Afghan President Hamid Karzai announced picks for 14 of his cabinet posts yesterday, only one of which was a woman. In addition, selection of a leader for Afghanistan’s Ministry of Women’s Affairs was conspicuously missing from President Hamid Karzai’s list. Dr. Sima Samar, who heads the Ministry of Women’s Affairs in the interim government and served as vice chair for the loya jirga, has suffered verbal attacks recently from Islamic fundamentalists for unconfirmed reports that she does not believe in Islamic law. Samar has yet to be appointed to a position in Karzai’s government.
Few of the choices differed from those already serving in the interim government including several warlords. “Afghanistan’s warlords are stronger today than they were 10 days ago before the loya jirga started,” said Saman Zia-Zarifi, senior researcher for Human Rights Watch. “Short term political expediency has clearly triumphed over human rights.” Representatives of two parties implicated in recent attacks on ethnic Pashtun civilians in northern Afghanistan were appointed to four key cabinet positions while Fazul Hadi Shinwari, who is known for his drastic punishments such as stoning and amputation, was chosen to serve as Chief Justice of the Supreme Court.
Human Rights Watch believes that the warlords’ presence in the new government is due to the lack of an international security presence in the country. “Instead of creating a space for civilian leadership to emerge during the six-month interval, the lack of an internationally enforced security arrangement meant that warlords used that time to rebuild their military and political networks,” Zia-Zarifi said. The Feminist Majority joins Human Rights Watch in their call to Karzai to launch investigations into intimidation of loya jirga delegates by newly appointed leaders and equip the newly formed Afghan Human Rights Commission with the necessary resources to protect delegates as they return home.TAKE ACTION: Support Expansion of International Peacekeeping Troops in Afghanistan
Media Resources: Human Rights Watch 6/20/02; BBC 6/18/02
10/31/2014 Federal Judge Exempts Another Catholic University from Birth Control Coverage - A federal judge ruled Tuesday that Ave Maria University, a Catholic university in Florida, does not have to comply with federal rules meant to ensure that covered employees can exercise their right to obtain birth control at no cost.
The Affordable Care Act requires all new health insurance plans to cover all FDA-approved contraceptives - such as the pill, emergency contraceptives, and IUDs - without charging co-pays, deductibles or co-insurance. . . .
10/31/2014 Women of Color in Tennessee Are United in Opposition to Amendment 1 - Just days before the general election in Tennessee, a coalition of community leaders, clergy, and advocates led a press conference encouraging women of color to vote no on Amendment 1, a dangerous and far-reaching measure on the state's ballot.
SisterReach, a grassroots organization focused on "empowering, organizing, and mobilizing women and girls in the community around their reproductive and sexual health to make informed decisions about themselves," organized the press conference "to call attention to the unique concerns Black and poor communities throughout Shelby County and across the state of Tennessee face on a daily basis" and to emphasize how the upcoming election "could further limit [black women's] reproductive, economic, political, and social autonomy."
"We assemble today to impress upon black women and women of color, many of whom are heads of households, to get out and vote," said SisterReacher Founder and CEO Cherisse Scott at the event.
SisterReach has been educating voters about the particularly dangerous impact of Amendment 1 on women of color. . . .
10/30/2014 Medication Abortion Access Threatened by Oklahoma Court Ruling - An Oklahoma state district court judge has refused to block a state law restricting medication abortion, clearing the way for the law to go into affect on November 1.
The Oklahoma Coalition for Reproductive Justice, together with a local abortion clinic in Tulsa, challenged HB 2684 in September, arguing that the law was an unconstitutional restriction on non-surgical abortion in the earliest weeks of pregnancy. . . .