Tonight: Nickelodeon to Feature Story on Gay Parenting
Despite fervent protests by Christian fundamentalists, television network Nickelodeon will proceed tonight with its telecast of “Nick News Special Edition: My Family is Different”—a half-hour forum focusing on children of gay parents. Slated for the 9 p.m. slot generally watched by older children, the program is primarily a discussion among children, ages 10 to 15 years, in both gay and straight households. In addition, producer Linda Ellerbee will include discussion from entertainer Rosie O’Donnell, a gay New York City firefighter, a gay school principal, and right-wing televangelist Jerry Falwell. Read More About Falwell In Falwell’s videotape contribution, he admits that while “gay parenting is not overall a good thing… hatred is wrong, always.” Still, Andrea Lafferty, executive director of the Washington-based Traditional Values Coalition, warns:“[The program] is a cover for promoting homosexuality for kids,” and consequently, parents can no longer trust the network’s content.
According to The Washington Post writer Tom Shales: “What’s scary about the kind of protest that has been mounted is that it seeks to suppress all debate rather than merely put forth a viewpoint; the protesters are saying that merely by acknowledging the existence of same-sex living arrangements, the producers are automatically encouraging them or advocating acceptance of them.” Nickelodeon’s chief executive Herb Scannell defended his network’s decision to air the show. “I thought it was in a territory that we’ve been before, in terms of looking at the world from a kid’s point of view,” he said. “The whole philosophy of Nick is that it’s tough to be a kid in an adult world.”
Media Resources: CNN 6/18/02; NY Times 6/18/02; Washington Post 6/18/02
10/13/2015 EEOC Launches Hollywood Gender Discrimination Probe - The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) has contacted several women directors in Hollywood in an effort to determine whether legal intervention is necessary to disrupt the industry's discriminatory hiring practices.
In a letter sent to some 50 women filmmakers, the EEOC - which is responsible for protecting individuals from employment discrimination based on sex, race, color, religion and national origin through enforcement of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 - requested interviews with them to "learn more about the gender-related issues" women behind the camera face in both the film and television industries.
In May, following the release of a study by the San Diego State University Center for the Study of Women in Television in Film revealing only 7 percent of 2014's 250 top-grossing movies were helmed by women, the ACLU of Southern California and the national ACLU Women's Rights Project urged state and federal rights agencies to investigate Hollywood's failure to hire equal numbers of women. . . .
10/12/2015 Report Finds Texas' HB2 Increases Abortion Wait Times - A new report released by the University of Texas at Austin, Texas Policy Evaluation Project found patients seeking abortions in Texas have experienced an increase in wait times since the passage of HB2, the 2013 Texas omnibus anti-abortion bill that attempts to cut off abortion access by requiring abortion providers in the state to fulfill medically unnecessary ambulatory surgical center requirements and secure hospital admitting privileges.
More than half of 42 clinics providing abortion in Texas have been forced to shut their doors since HB2 passed two years ago, leading Texas women to wait up to 20 days for a first consult at one of the surviving 18 reproductive health clinics operating in the state, the second most populous in the nation. . . .
10/9/2015 Federal Judge Orders Anti-Abortion Group to Cede Footage to NAF - On Tuesday, a federal judge ruled that anti-abortion group Center for Medical Progress (CMP) and its leader David Daleidan must turn over all previously unreleased "sting" videos and outtakes of National Abortion Federation (NAF) meetings the group obtained surreptitiously as part of a smear campaign against the abortion provider.
U.S. . . .