In a blow for advocates of safe and legal abortion, the Supreme Court today decided to review part of the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals decision in NOW v Scheidler, the civil case where anti-abortion extremists were found to have conspired illegally to close women’s reproductive health clinics, by using threats and extortionate acts against doctors, clinic employees and patients, in violation of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO). “After 16 years, yet another hurdle for justice,” said Eleanor Smeal, President of the Feminist Majority Foundation. Smeal initiated the case in 1986 as president of the National Organization for Women.
The Supreme Court has agreed to review two issues: whether the actions of the anti-abortion extremists, including restraining clinic workers and patients, entering clinics and destroying medical equipment and blocking doorways and entrances to clinics, qualify as extortion under the Hobbs Act and whether private plaintiffs, such as NOW, can get injunctions under RICO as the government can.
In its review of the case, the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals found that “the record is replete with evidence of instances in which their [the anti-abortion extremists’] conduct crossed the line from protected speech to illegal acts, including acts of violence.” Further, the Court stated that letters sent by Joseph Scheidler, a key anti-abortion extremist, to clinics promising assaults if the clinic remained open “constituted true threats outside the protection of the First Amendment.”
The case will be heard in the 2002-2003 term.
Media Resources: Associated Press, 4/22/02; Feminist Majority Foundation
10/21/2014 Afghanistan's New First Lady Advances Women's Issues - Just a few days after moving to the presidential palace, Afghanistan's new First Lady Rula Ghani said that she hopes to encourage greater respect for women.
Rula Ghani already broke tradition by participating in her husband, Ashraf Ghani Ahmadzai's, campaign for President. . . .
10/21/2014 Hulu Silences Rape Survivor Speaking Out Against Anti-Abortion Amendment 67 in Colorado - Hulu, an online, ad-supported streaming service, has refused to run an advertisement from the "No on 67" campaign in Colorado, citing the company's policy regarding "controversial" political positions on issues like abortion.
In a letter to the CEO of Hulu, dated October 10, the Vote No on 67 Campaign, which is supported by the Feminist Majority Foundation, asked the company to reconsider its unwillingness to air a 35-second spot featuring a rape survivor's testimony about the far-reaching impact of Colorado's proposed Amendment 67. . . .