Ms. magazine  -- more than a magazine a movement

SIGN UP FOR MS. DIGEST, JOBS, NEWS AND ALERTS

FEMINIST WIRE NEWSBRIEFS

ABOUT
SEE CURRENT ISSUE
SHOP MS. STORE
MS. IN THE CLASSROOM
FEMINIST DAILY WIRE
FEMINIST RESOURCES
PRESS
JOBS AT MS.
READ BACK ISSUES
CONTACT
RSS (XML)
 
feminist wire | daily newsbriefs

December-06-01

If Women Had A Foreign Policy

Looking for ways to measure 30 years of Ms., I scribbled down notes: the first issue featured unpublished work by Virginia Woolf and Sylvia Plath, two dead women. Now there are talented writers with rooms of their own, who have no intention of committing suicide. Unnecessary mastectomies, cesareans, breast implants--all these were early Ms. exposÚs. Now readers need to know more about environmental causes, prevention, wellness. Ms. once had to prove that "women's lib" was not confined to New York and California. Now the worldwide women's movement is the most popular part of our coverage. Then come blank pages in my notebook. A few blocks away, terrorism had created an inferno that ended this country's separation from the world forever.

Like so many women in other countries whose stories have been told in these pages, we had learned the painful reality behind words like terrorism...buried in the rubble...body count. Messages of shock and sorrow arrived at the Ms. office from Afghan women's groups and Palestinian camps, Bosnia and India. Arab and Muslim women especially wanted us to know: this was not done in our name! Some messages were unspoken: why is your terrorism more serious than ours?

Then the kaleidoscope of memory turned, and the past fell into a new design. I remember meetings, soon after Ms. was launched, among Israeli, Palestinian, and U.S. feminists. We were very conscious of invading male turf but hoped to build a bridge. After painful weeks of arguing, we agreed on a two-state solution--a Palestinian state and secure borders for Israel--that was neither original, nor without its irony. Many of us agreed with Virginia Woolf that, "as a woman, I have no country," yet there we were, supporting two. In the end, male Palestinian colleagues of some of our members asked them not to sign, and we never published our agreement.

I thought again of our meetings when U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell insisted post-September 11 that the U.S. had been supporting a two-state solution all along. Israel's Sharon responded with intransigence; Arafat with powerlessness. I wondered: if we had just kept on going, could we have cast a rope across the chasm before 30 years had widened it?

In 1980, hundreds of women leaders were invited by the U.S. State Department to hear a report on the Decade for Women. Because the U.S. had just begun to arm the mujahideen in their religious war against Afghanistan's Soviet-backed government, this seemed hypocritical. Ms. had published reports from Afghanistan stating that "encouraging women to attend political meetings, reforming laws so that women could marry without parental consent, sending girls to school-these were the 'sins' of the Marxist government, and the reason that Orthodox Muslim tribesmen took up arms." I and others stood up in the auditorium to protest U.S. support for gender apartheid.

Were we criticized? No, we weren't taken that seriously. We were ignored. In the end, the U.S. gave a staggering $3 billion to the religious extremists; refugee camps produced male orphans who would become the Taliban; and Osama bin Laden, one of many who came from other countries to fight a holy war with U.S. arms, was so strengthened by defeating the godless Soviets that he has now decided to take on another superpower.

In retrospect, I wish we had occupied the State Department, chained ourselves to our chairs, and done anything to block these policies. I wish we had reached out to other women who knew firsthand the danger of fundamentalisms: from Hindu extremists in India who bomb mosques and burn widows to Buddhists in Japan who use poison gas in an "apocalyptic war"; from Christian cults in Uganda that rape and murder girls to Christian right-wingers here who bomb abortion clinics and murder doctors. As always with groups that must normalize violence, every one of them had created a hyper-masculinity to make men kill off the gentle

Media Resources: MsMagazine


© Feminist Majority Foundation, publisher of Ms. magazine

If you liked this story, consider making a tax-deductible donation to support Ms. magazine.

 

 

Send to a Friend
Their
Your
Comments
(optional)


More Feminist News

10/30/2014 Medication Abortion Access Threatened by Oklahoma Court Ruling - An Oklahoma state district court judge has refused to block a state law restricting medication abortion, clearing the way for the law to go into affect on November 1. The Oklahoma Coalition for Reproductive Justice, together with a local abortion clinic in Tulsa, challenged HB 2684 in September, arguing that the law was an unconstitutional restriction on non-surgical abortion in the earliest weeks of pregnancy. . . .
 
10/30/2014 UPS Switches Pregnant Worker Policy Ahead of Supreme Court Case - The United Parcel Service (UPS) is changing its policy on light duty assignments for pregnant workers, even though the company will stand by its refusal to extend accommodations to a former employee in an upcoming Supreme Court case. UPS announced on Monday in a memo to employees, and in a brief filed with the US Supreme Court, that the company will begin offering temporary, light-duty positions to pregnant workers on January 1, 2015. . . .
 
10/30/2014 North Dakota Medical Students Speak Out Against Measure 1 - Medical students at the University of North Dakota School of Medicine and Health Sciences are asking North Dakotans to vote no on Measure 1, a personhood measure on the state ballot this fall. The students issued published a letter in the Grand Forks Herald stating that they opposed Measure 1 in part because they are against "the government's taking control of the personal health care decisions of its citizens." Nearly 60 UND School of Medicine students signed the letter, citing concerns over the "very broad and ambiguous language" used in the proposed amendment, which has no regard for serious and life-threatening medical situations such as ectopic pregnancies. Measure 1 would change the North Dakota state constitution to create an "inalienable right to life" for humans "at any stage of development" - including the moment of fertilization and conception. . . .