Though we just inaugurated the new president, it feels as if we just threw away our barf bags after his less-than-glorious election. With a mandate-less president and a sharply divided Congress, we women need to watch our elected officials carefully. As a former member of Congress, I know what it feels like to be watched, so I can tell you the best way to apply pressure. Gather like-minded friends and form a monitoring cabal. Think up a creative name for the group. And make sure young women are represented. Remember, we never would have gotten the vote if younger women hadn't taken up the cause.
Here are some watchdog techniques:
*If your elected officials aren't to your liking, meet with them as a group and give them a chance to "court" you. All federal representatives have offices in their local districts and all are interested in expanding their base. But since they don't read brain waves, you'll have to tell them why you didn't support them. This is crucial because "I never knew this was important to you" is a politician's favorite excuse.
*Even if your candidate won, she or he still needs reminding that your continued support is based on kept promises.
*If your attempts to meet are thwarted, write letters to the editor relating your experience. Run an ad with the politician's picture, offering a reward for anyone who can supply information on the whereabouts of this person. You'll be called troublemakers—a badge that you should wear proudly.
*Whenever an issue comes up that you care about, alert your elected representatives. If they vote incorrectly, print up flyers describing the issue and telling people how their legislator voted. Send a copy to that legislator and say that you posted hundreds all over the district. Extending tentacles into the community is a politician's worst nightmare, and most will want to know how to stop you.
Now, which issues should we be watchdogging? With everyone sprinting toward the center, many of our concerns are going to be far to the left of anything this president and Congress can deal with. Given the realities of this political climate, first we need to preserve some rights—like Roe v. Wade, affirmative action, Title IX, and the Violence Against Women Act—that we've already won. Use all the techniques I mentioned to hold the line on this woman-friendly legislation.
In a less deadlock-prone environment, I might have proposed lobbying for passage of the Equal Rights Amendment, but now that seems like a fruitless gesture. Instead, work toward the passage of the Paycheck Fairness Act. With women still making only about 76 cents to a man's dollar, it's a no-brainer. And while we're talking about wages, how about pushing for the government to give more contracts to the growing number of women-owned businesses?
Get your legislators to improve women's health care. In August 2000, the National Women's Law Center and other groups released a report called "Making the Grade on Women's Health." Eight states and the District of Columbia failed, 42 states got an Unsatisfactory, and not one got a Satisfactory. Policymakers, meanwhile, deal mostly with our reproductive organs, even though heart disease, for example, is the number one killer of women.
Just think of all the votes Congress has taken on abortion, teen abstinence, the abortion pill, and family planning, while Viagra has almost no FDA restrictions and is covered by many insurance programs. Wouldn't you think they could connect the dots between Viagra and family planning? So, here's your homework assignment. On February 15, the new administration is deciding whether to release funding for international family-planning programs. Congress has consistently refused to support any international programs that fund abortions. This is how politicians have it both ways: they tell the left they voted for international family planning, and they tell the right they r
10/13/2015 EEOC Launches Hollywood Gender Discrimination Probe - The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) has contacted several women directors in Hollywood in an effort to determine whether legal intervention is necessary to disrupt the industry's discriminatory hiring practices.
In a letter sent to some 50 women filmmakers, the EEOC - which is responsible for protecting individuals from employment discrimination based on sex, race, color, religion and national origin through enforcement of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 - requested interviews with them to "learn more about the gender-related issues" women behind the camera face in both the film and television industries.
In May, following the release of a study by the San Diego State University Center for the Study of Women in Television in Film revealing only 7 percent of 2014's 250 top-grossing movies were helmed by women, the ACLU of Southern California and the national ACLU Women's Rights Project urged state and federal rights agencies to investigate Hollywood's failure to hire equal numbers of women. . . .
10/12/2015 Report Finds Texas' HB2 Increases Abortion Wait Times - A new report released by the University of Texas at Austin, Texas Policy Evaluation Project found patients seeking abortions in Texas have experienced an increase in wait times since the passage of HB2, the 2013 Texas omnibus anti-abortion bill that attempts to cut off abortion access by requiring abortion providers in the state to fulfill medically unnecessary ambulatory surgical center requirements and secure hospital admitting privileges.
More than half of 42 clinics providing abortion in Texas have been forced to shut their doors since HB2 passed two years ago, leading Texas women to wait up to 20 days for a first consult at one of the surviving 18 reproductive health clinics operating in the state, the second most populous in the nation. . . .
10/9/2015 Federal Judge Orders Anti-Abortion Group to Cede Footage to NAF - On Tuesday, a federal judge ruled that anti-abortion group Center for Medical Progress (CMP) and its leader David Daleidan must turn over all previously unreleased "sting" videos and outtakes of National Abortion Federation (NAF) meetings the group obtained surreptitiously as part of a smear campaign against the abortion provider.
U.S. . . .