Ms. magazine  -- more than a magazine a movement

SIGN UP FOR MS. DIGEST, JOBS, NEWS AND ALERTS

FEMINIST WIRE NEWSBRIEFS

ABOUT
SEE CURRENT ISSUE
SHOP MS. STORE
MS. IN THE CLASSROOM
FEMINIST DAILY WIRE
FEMINIST RESOURCES
PRESS
JOBS AT MS.
READ BACK ISSUES
CONTACT
RSS (XML)
 
feminist wire | daily newsbriefs

July-11-00

Entrapment

A push by antiabortion groups to impose new state health and safety laws on women's clinics comes neatly packaged as concern for women's welfare. Pro-choice groups have dubbed them TRAP (Targeted Restrictions on Abortion Providers) laws, charging that such regulations are no more than an underhanded attack on a woman's right to choose. Gloria Feldt, president of Planned Parenthood Federation of America told Ms., "Clearly, when anti-choice legislators concoct a bill whose real purpose is to reduce access to abortion, but frame it as though it were to improve women's health, they have been very clever."

The regulations include specified widths for clinic corridors, particular hours for cutting clinic lawns, and requiring tests that are not medically indicated. All these measures, which will cost clinics thousands of dollars, are unrelated to the safety of abortion procedures. In 1999 Arizona, Louisiana, Michigan, and Texas all passed TRAP laws. This year, laws were introduced in Ohio, South Carolina, and Virginia (where the bill was later defeated). TRAP laws "will inevitably raise the cost of abortion," says Bonnie Scott Jones, staff attorney for the Center for Reproductive Law and Policy (CRLP), thus restricting access for poor women, who are already denied most Medicaid-funded abortions. And clinics facing heavy costs and administrative nightmares may stop offering abortions.

TRAP law supporters claim the laws are a response to increasing numbers of abortion-related fatalities. But, in fact, between 1972 and 1992 (the most recent statistics available) the fatality rate decreased by 58 percent. And the Centers for Disease Control reports there is less than one fatality per 100,000 abortions. "These laws are not about making abortion safer," says CRLP spokesperson Margie Kelly, "but about making it virtually impossible for women to access abortion or to afford the procedures."

Back to Ms.

Media Resources: MsMagazine


© Feminist Majority Foundation, publisher of Ms. magazine

If you liked this story, consider making a tax-deductible donation to support Ms. magazine.

 

 

Send to a Friend
Their
Your
Comments
(optional)


More Feminist News

1/27/2016 Study Exposes 'Gender Gap' in Media Coverage of Reproductive Issues - A new study by the Women's Media Center has revealed more than half of news stories focusing on reproductive issues are written by men. According to WMC Media Watch: the Gender Gap in Coverage of Reproductive Issues, men penned 52 percent of bylines discussing issues of reproductive health care - including contraception and abortion - compared to just 37 percent by women. . . .
 
1/27/2016 Taiwan Elects First Woman President - In a landslide victory, the leader of Taiwan's Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Tsai Ing-wen won the country's presidential election, becoming the first woman in Taiwan's history to hold the position. Emphasizing her party's commitment to maintaining Taiwan's independence from China, Tsai won over young voters eager to usher in a political changing of the guard following some 70 years of dominance by the pro-Chinese unification party, the Kuomintang (KMT), chaired by presidential opponent Eric Chu. . . .
 
1/26/2016 Anti-Abortion Extremists Behind Planned Parenthood Attack Videos Indicted - Two anti-abortion extremists responsible for last year's misleading videos attacking Planned Parenthood have been indicted on criminal charges by a grand jury in Houston, Texas. On Monday, Harris County district attorney Devon Anderson announced that David Daleiden, the director of the Center for Medical Progress (CMP) - the group behind deceptive videos falsely accusing Planned Parenthood of illegally selling fetal tissue - was indicted on a felony charge of tampering with a governmental record and on a misdemeanor charge related to the purchasing of human organs. . . .