Male Athletes Claim Discrimination, Sue Education Department
A coalition of male athletes has sued the Department of Education claiming that provisions made for women in accordance with Title IX have led to discrimination against men. In the suit, the coalition, led by several male wrestling teams, claims that schools are cutting back opportunities for men in sports in an effort to create parity in the numbers of men and women participating in athletics. The plaintiffs claim that they are not challenging Title IX itself but the interpretation of the law. Feminist Majority Foundation President Eleanor Smeal, however, cautioned, “This tactic has been used repeatedly to weaken Title IX.”
The National Women’s Law Center (NWLC) agrees. Marcia Greenberger, NWLC co-president claims that the plaintiffs are merely trying to undermine the intent of Title IX. Greenberger also suggests that the plaintiffs’ claims are baseless, pointing out that female athletes comprise only one-third of athletic operating budgets and that seventy-two percent of colleges and universities had added women’s athletic teams to their offerings without eliminating any men’s teams. In sheer numbers, male college athletes are still more dominate than female college athletes, and women are still discriminated against in athletic programs. For example, women receive only thirty percent of athletic recruiting dollars at Division I colleges and 33 percent of overall athletic budgets even though women may represent more than 50 percent of the total student bodies.
Media Resources: Washington Post, 1/17/02; National Women’s Law Center Press Release, 1/16/02; Feminist Majority Foundation
10/30/2014 Medication Abortion Access Threatened by Oklahoma Court Ruling - An Oklahoma state district court judge has refused to block a state law restricting medication abortion, clearing the way for the law to go into affect on November 1.
The Oklahoma Coalition for Reproductive Justice, together with a local abortion clinic in Tulsa, challenged HB 2684 in September, arguing that the law was an unconstitutional restriction on non-surgical abortion in the earliest weeks of pregnancy. . . .
10/30/2014 UPS Switches Pregnant Worker Policy Ahead of Supreme Court Case - The United Parcel Service (UPS) is changing its policy on light duty assignments for pregnant workers, even though the company will stand by its refusal to extend accommodations to a former employee in an upcoming Supreme Court case.
UPS announced on Monday in a memo to employees, and in a brief filed with the US Supreme Court, that the company will begin offering temporary, light-duty positions to pregnant workers on January 1, 2015. . . .
10/30/2014 North Dakota Medical Students Speak Out Against Measure 1 - Medical students at the University of North Dakota School of Medicine and Health Sciences are asking North Dakotans to vote no on Measure 1, a personhood measure on the state ballot this fall.
The students issued published a letter in the Grand Forks Herald stating that they opposed Measure 1 in part because they are against "the government's taking control of the personal health care decisions of its citizens." Nearly 60 UND School of Medicine students signed the letter, citing concerns over the "very broad and ambiguous language" used in the proposed amendment, which has no regard for serious and life-threatening medical situations such as ectopic pregnancies.
Measure 1 would change the North Dakota state constitution to create an "inalienable right to life" for humans "at any stage of development" - including the moment of fertilization and conception. . . .