Marianne Stanley filed a EEOC-backed sex discrimination lawsuit against the University of Southern California in 1996 after learning that men's basketball coach George Raveling earned at least $54,000 more than she did as coach of the women's team. Stanley now coaches for the University of California-Berkeley's women's basketball team.
In a 2-1 decision, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that USC was justified in paying Stanley less because she had fewer years of experience as a coach and marketer than did Raveling. Chief Judge Procter Hug stated that the "markedly different levels of experience and qualifications" between Stanley and Raveling were adequate reasons for the difference in their pay.
Dissenting Judge Harry Pregerson argued that the ruling ignored ample evidence of sex discrimination and commented, "The university's half-hearted promotion of the women's basketball program, its intensive marketing of the men's basketball program, and the formidable obstacles Stanley faced as a woman athlete in a male-dominated profession contributed to this disparate treatment."
Stanley's lawyer has stated that he will request a rehearing by the full court.
11/24/2014 The City of Louisville Has Overwhelmingly Approved a CEDAW Resolution - The city of Louisville, Kentucky approved a resolution that will use the UN Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW) as a framework for all future policy aimed at ending gender-based discrimination.
Councilwoman Tina Ward-Pugh introduced the resolution, which passed overwhelmingly on November 6. . . .
11/21/2014 Fifth Circuit Court Refuses to Reconsider Ruling Blocking Mississippi TRAP Law - The full US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit on Thursday refused to reconsider a panel decision blocking enforcement of a Mississippi law that threatened to close the last remaining abortion clinic in the state.
In July, a panel of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a preliminary injunction against a Mississippi TRAP (Targeted Regulation of Abortion Providers) law requiring abortion providers to obtain admitting privileges at local hospitals. . . .