An eyewitness to the bombings in Kabul reported that Afghans greeted the U.S.-led military strikes in Afghanistan with silent enthusiasm. According to the eyewitness [as reported in the New York Times], a twenty-five year old man now living in a Pakistani refugee area, Afghan women were the most hopeful that U.S. attacks would lead to the end of the Taliban and its brutally restrictive system of gender apartheid. “Among women, there was optimism, 100 percent,” he told reporters. Under the Taliban, women have been banned from schools, barred from working, prohibited from meeting in groups, and forbidden to leave their homes without a close male relative or without a head-to-toe burqa shroud. Women make up sixty to seventy percent of the Afghan population, and before the Taliban rose to power, were the majority of teachers, healthcare workers, and university students.
The eyewitness also spoke of the uncertainty that many Afghans feel about the fate of a possible post-Taliban Afghanistan. He reports that in Kabul, many worry that the Northern Alliance will advance into the city and assume control of Afghanistan. Part of the hopefulness of the Afghan people over the attacks, the man explained, was the hope for a return to constitutional democracy. “People saw those bombs, and they said, ‘We can bear these things because finally we may get a government of the people, for the people and by the people.’”
The Feminist Majority has launched a massive campaign aimed at increasing humanitarian aid to the Afghan people, the restoration of Afghan women’s rights, and the establishment of a constitutional democracy in Afghanistan. To find out how you can help, log on to www.HelpAfghanWomen.com.
Media Resources: New York Times, 10/14/01; Feminist Majority
6/30/2015 Supreme Court Ruling Prevents Gerrymandering in Arizona - In a 5-4 decision delivered by Justice Ginsburg this morning, the Supreme Court upheld Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission, allowing the use of independent state commissions that draw federal congressional districts, taking that power away from the state legislature.
This gives states an opportunity to deal with partisan gerrymandering by giving an independent commission power to draw federal congressional districts.
In 2000, Arizona voters amended their constitution, shifting the responsibility of drawing congressional districts, previously held by the state legislature, to a panel called the Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission. . . .
6/29/2015 The Supreme Court Just Saved Texas Abortion Clinics - The Supreme Court ruled 5 to 4 today to put a temporary hold on a Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals ruling that would have closed all but 9 of the state's abortion clinics in Texas.
The order from the Supreme Court comes in response to an emergency request filed by women's health care providers on the behalf of Texas women earlier this month asking the Court to stay House Bill 2, which would have taken effect as law on Wednesday. . . .