Many Vie for Control over Post-Taliban Afghanistan; Women’s Lives Hang in the Balance
Already in the media, debate has begun about what and who would constitute a post-Taliban Afghan government. Some favor allowing Afghanistan’s former king, Mohammed Zahir Shah, negotiate a new representative government by calling a loya jirga, a grand assembly that could possibly determine Afghanistan’s new leadership if the Taliban is ousted. The Taliban has held the Afghan people hostage since 1996 and has instituted a brutal system of gender apartheid where women are denied basic human rights such as education, adequate medical attention, and the right to work.
Some former heads of factions in the mujahideen, are now vying for seats in the loya jirga. Pashtun warlord Gulbuddin Hekmatyar, who received U.S. and Pakistani military aid as a member of the mujahideen during Soviet Occupation of Afghanistan, is one such leader. Hekmatyar, also know as the “Butcher of Kabul” by many Afghans, is a vicious warrior who fought for control of Kabul before the Taliban seized power. His political party opposed women’s rights and targeted women’s rights leaders in Afghanistan as well as attacked women on the streets of Pakistan in the early 1990s.
The Feminist Majority has called for the restoration of Afghan women’s rights and the establishment of a multi-ethnic constitutional democracy in Afghanistan where women have full representation and a voice in the creation of this new government. “We cannot allow history to repeat itself,” said Eleanor Smeal, President of the Feminist Majority. “Afghan women winning their freedom and rights is essential for restoring a stable, productive Afghan society that does not harbor terrorism. We cannot allow one fundamentalist extremist group to be replaced with another.”
For more information on the Feminist Majority’s Campaign to Stop Gender Apartheid in Afghanistan, and to find out how you can help, log on to www.HelpAfghanWomen.com.
Media Resources: Washington Post, 10/5/01; Feminist Majority
10/31/2014 Federal Judge Exempts Another Catholic University from Birth Control Coverage - A federal judge ruled Tuesday that Ave Maria University, a Catholic university in Florida, does not have to comply with federal rules meant to ensure that covered employees can exercise their right to obtain birth control at no cost.
The Affordable Care Act requires all new health insurance plans to cover all FDA-approved contraceptives - such as the pill, emergency contraceptives, and IUDs - without charging co-pays, deductibles or co-insurance. . . .
10/31/2014 Women of Color in Tennessee Are United in Opposition to Amendment 1 - Just days before the general election in Tennessee, a coalition of community leaders, clergy, and advocates led a press conference encouraging women of color to vote no on Amendment 1, a dangerous and far-reaching measure on the state's ballot.
SisterReach, a grassroots organization focused on "empowering, organizing, and mobilizing women and girls in the community around their reproductive and sexual health to make informed decisions about themselves," organized the press conference "to call attention to the unique concerns Black and poor communities throughout Shelby County and across the state of Tennessee face on a daily basis" and to emphasize how the upcoming election "could further limit [black women's] reproductive, economic, political, and social autonomy."
"We assemble today to impress upon black women and women of color, many of whom are heads of households, to get out and vote," said SisterReacher Founder and CEO Cherisse Scott at the event.
SisterReach has been educating voters about the particularly dangerous impact of Amendment 1 on women of color. . . .
10/30/2014 Medication Abortion Access Threatened by Oklahoma Court Ruling - An Oklahoma state district court judge has refused to block a state law restricting medication abortion, clearing the way for the law to go into affect on November 1.
The Oklahoma Coalition for Reproductive Justice, together with a local abortion clinic in Tulsa, challenged HB 2684 in September, arguing that the law was an unconstitutional restriction on non-surgical abortion in the earliest weeks of pregnancy. . . .