Ms. magazine  -- more than a magazine a movement

SIGN UP FOR MS. DIGEST, JOBS, NEWS AND ALERTS

FEMINIST WIRE NEWSBRIEFS

ABOUT
SEE CURRENT ISSUE
SHOP MS. STORE
MS. IN THE CLASSROOM
FEMINIST DAILY WIRE
FEMINIST RESOURCES
PRESS
JOBS AT MS.
READ BACK ISSUES
CONTACT
RSS (XML)
 
feminist wire | daily newsbriefs

May-15-01

Helms Attempts to Stop Ratification of International Criminal Court

In July 1998, 120 countries, excluding the United States, voted to adopt the Rome Statute establishing the International Criminal Court (ICC). Article 7 of the Rome Statute presents clear language defining gender crimes including rape, sexual slavery, enforced prostitution, forced pregnancy, enforced sterilization, or any other form of sexual violence of comparable gravity, and crime of apartheid as crimes against humanity. Under Article 7, the Taliban’s brutal gender apartheid rule, if still in existence once the court is established, would qualify as crimes against humanity and, therefore eligible to be tried before the ICC.

Currently, 139 countries have signed the Rome Statute and 30 countries have ratified the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. The U.S. may join the ICC with the signature of the President of the U.S. on the Rome Treaty and with ratification of the Treaty by 2/3 of the Senate. On December 31, 2000, former President Clinton signed the Rome Statue.

Senator Jesse Helms, chair of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, has made defeating the ratification efforts for the Rome Treaty his top priority, and on May 9, 2001, Helms introduced the American Servicemembers' Protection Act, which:

· prohibits the U.S. government, state and local governments, including courts, to assist, cooperate, support the ICC or respond to requests for cooperation from the ICC to help prosecute war criminals;
· severely restricts the transfer of information to the ICC to help prosecute war criminals;
· penalizes any country that is a party to the ICC by providing no U.S. military assistance; and
· limits U.S. participation in peacekeeping missions or any military operation to maintain or restore international peace and security.

On May 10, 2001, by a vote of 282-137, the American Servicemembers’ Protection Act (ASPA) passed in the House; next week the Senate will vote on the measure.

The American Servicemembers’ Protection Act sends the wrong message to those responsible for genocide and crimes against humanity that the U.S., the world’s superpower, opposes a court for international justice.

TAKE ACTION: Urge the Senate to support the International Criminal Court for the rights of women and oppose the American Servicemembers’ Protection Act.

Media Resources: Feminist Majority Foundation


© Feminist Majority Foundation, publisher of Ms. magazine

If you liked this story, consider making a tax-deductible donation to support Ms. magazine.

 

 

Send to a Friend
Their
Your
Comments
(optional)


More Feminist News

4/18/2014 Texas Hospitals Revoke Admitting Privileges to Abortion Providers - Reproductive health access in Texas continues to vanish in the wake of HB 2, the omnibus anti-abortion bill that, among other things, requires abortion providers to have admitting privileges in order to keep their clinics open. . . .
 
4/18/2014 Dartmouth President Calls For Changes In Wake of Federal Sexual Assault Investigation - Dartmouth College President Phil Hanlon gave a powerful speech Wednesday night calling for significant changes on campus in light of its high rates of sexual assault, high-risk drinking, and discriminatory social scene. "Darmouth's promise is being hijacked by high-risk and harmful behaviors, behaviors that are hurting too many of our students, dividing us as a community and distracting from our important work of teaching and learning," Hanlon said. . . .
 
4/17/2014 Federal Court Permanently Blocks North Dakota's Extreme 6-Week Abortion Ban - A federal district court permanently blocked one of the most restrictive abortion bans in the nation yesterday, calling it "invalid and unconstitutional." The North Dakota law, HB 1456, directly challenged Roe v. . . .