Second Judge OKs Suit Against LAPD as Racketeering Enterprise
U.S. District Judge Gary A. Feess has ruled that the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) law can be used in the case against the Los Angeles Police Department Rampart Division, where officers have been charged with murder, perjury, cover-ups, planting false evidence, theft, assault, and rape. This is the second case in seven months in which a Federal Judge has allowed RICO to be used against the LAPD. “Judge Feess’ decision is a major milestone in the struggle against police corruption and violence,” says Katherine Spillar, executive vice president of the Feminist Majority Foundation. “RICO will be key in breaking up the systematic cover-up by the LAPD of the criminal activity of its own officers, and in prosecuting officers involved in the widespread conspiracy to commit crimes.”
The Feminist Majority Foundation and its National Center for Women in Policing (NCWP) have been pressing for an investigation by authorities into the role the underrepresentation of women in the LAPD has played in the Rampart and other police scandals. “We have been disappointed that, to date, no such study has been undertaken,” says Chief Penny Harrington, director of NCWP. “Sadly, a huge underlying component of police violence and corruption has been ignored.” In its own analysis of the LAPD and police corruption cases, NCWP revealed a significant gender gap in police liability cases, with LAPD payouts on male officers for excessive use of force and assaults exceeding payouts on female officers by a ratio of 23:1.
10/21/2014 Afghanistan's New First Lady Advances Women's Issues - Just a few days after moving to the presidential palace, Afghanistan's new First Lady Rula Ghani said that she hopes to encourage greater respect for women.
Rula Ghani already broke tradition by participating in her husband, Ashraf Ghani Ahmadzai's, campaign for President. . . .
10/21/2014 Hulu Silences Rape Survivor Speaking Out Against Anti-Abortion Amendment 67 in Colorado - Hulu, an online, ad-supported streaming service, has refused to run an advertisement from the "No on 67" campaign in Colorado, citing the company's policy regarding "controversial" political positions on issues like abortion.
In a letter to the CEO of Hulu, dated October 10, the Vote No on 67 Campaign, which is supported by the Feminist Majority Foundation, asked the company to reconsider its unwillingness to air a 35-second spot featuring a rape survivor's testimony about the far-reaching impact of Colorado's proposed Amendment 67. . . .