Los Angeles -- More than 70 national and state women’s and civil rights
organizations joined an array of prominent women in business, law, medicine,
labor, education, sports and entertainment to launch the “Women Won’t Go
Back” Campaign to defeat the so-called California Civil Rights Initiative.
Campaign Co-Chairs Lorraine Sheinberg, Peg Yorkin, Chair of the Feminist
Majority, and Prema Mathai-Davis, National Executive Director of the YWCA of
the USA, announced today the formation of a statewide and national campaign
to save affirmative action, and expose an extreme and hidden section of the
CCRI which will expressly permit discrimination against women and girls.
“We are sounding the alarm today; the CCRI will not only gut affirmative
action for women and minorities in California, but will also destroy the very
foundation of California women’s rights law,” declared Eleanor Smeal,
president of the Feminist Majority: “This Campaign is significant not only
to California, but to the nation. The architects of the CCRI have introduced
similar language in 14 states and Congress. We must stop the CCRI in
California before it sweeps the nation.”
“The California Civil Rights Initiative means second class citizenship for
women and girls,” declared Prema Mathai-Davis, National Executive Director of
the YWCA of the USA. “For the first time in its 138 year history, the YWCA,
whose mission is to eliminate racism and sexism, has taken a position on a
ballot initiative because this is an emergency to save women’s rights and
civil rights. The YWCA urges California voters not to sign the CCRI
Leading constitutional law scholars Erwin Chmerinsky, USC School of Law,
and Laurie Levinson, Loyola Law School, discussed the impact of CCRI: “CCRI
will have a devastating impact on programs to remedy discrimination against
women and minorities. Gains of the past few years will be erased and
additional progress will be unlikely,” explained Professor Erwin Chemerinsky.
“I call ‘clause (c)’ the ‘No Women Need Apply’ clause. CCRI expressly
allows discrimination against women and girls in areas where it has never
been legally permitted. It will eviscerate the California constitution’s
current protection against gender discrimination, making it more difficult
for women to obtain legal protection,” added Professor Laurie Levenson.
“Working women everywhere in California will be hurt if CCRI passes,” said
Dolores Huerta, First Vice President of United Farm Workers, and spokesperson
for the Coalition of Labor Union Women. “California voters must understand
that women’s jobs and paychecks are on the line in this election.”
General Contractor Martha Diaz Aszkenazy observed, “With Wilson’s
roll-back of affirmative action, women construction owners are already seeing
cut-backs in bidding opportunities. If CCRI passes, the 6% of contracts that
women businesses currently get, will shrink to nothing. That’s why like many
other Republican women, not only will I be voting against CCRI, but I will be
working against CCRI.”
“This Campaign adds the voice of women to the campaigns already mobilized
in the African-American, Asian-Pacific American, and Latino communities,”
explained Connie Rice, Western Regional Counsel to the NAACP Legal Defense
and Educational Fund. “Together, we will stop the roll back of women’s
rights and civil rights.”
Andrea Van de Kamp, joined by young girls carrying signs reading “Give
Girls a Chance” and “Girls are Strong Too,” warned California voters, “Don’t
close the doors of opportunity on our daughters’ futures. We’ve come too
far. We won’t go back.”
8/28/2015 Alaska Court Protects Abortion Access for Low-Income Women - The Alaska Superior Court struck down a state law yesterday that would have severely limited abortion access for low-income women in Alaska.
The state's Superior Court also struck down a Department of Health and Social Services regulation that placed narrow specifications on Medicaid coverage for abortions, requiring that Medicaid-funded abortions be determined by a physician to be "medically necessary." Last year, the Center for Reproductive Rights, the American Civil Liberties Union, and Planned Parenthood sued on behalf of the Planned Parenthood of the Great Northwest, claiming that the narrow definition of "medically necessary" arbitrarily established conditions designed to restrict the ability of low-income women to access abortion services.
The law was temporarily blocked last July by an Alaskan state court judge.
Superior Court Judge John Suddock ordered yesterday that the state be blocked from implementing this regulation, ruling that it placed an undue burden on low-income women seeking abortion services in Alaska.
"By providing health care to all poor Alaskans except women who need abortions, the challenged regulation violates the state constitutional guarantee of 'equal rights, opportunities, and protection under the law'," the ruling read.
"We applaud the superior court for striing down these cruel restrictions on women's health and rights that violate the Alaska Constitution," said Chris Charbonneau, CEO of Planned Parenthood of the Great Northwest and the Hawaiian Islands. . . .
8/26/2015 Saudi Women Prepare to Vote for the First Time - The fight for gender equality is making slow but notable progress in Saudi Arabia, where women will be allowed to vote for the first time in upcoming December elections.
This shift in Saudi law came in 2011, when a royal decree announced that women would be allowed to vote and run in local elections beginning in December of 2015. . . .