Ms. magazine  -- more than a magazine a movement

SIGN UP FOR MS. DIGEST, JOBS, NEWS AND ALERTS

FEMINIST WIRE NEWSBRIEFS

ABOUT
SEE CURRENT ISSUE
SHOP MS. STORE
MS. IN THE CLASSROOM
FEMINIST DAILY WIRE
FEMINIST RESOURCES
PRESS
JOBS AT MS.
READ BACK ISSUES
CONTACT
RSS (XML)
 
feminist wire | daily newsbriefs

January-25-01

Two John Ashcrofts; One 25 Year Record Against Women’s Rights

WASHINGTON, DC – The John Ashcroft presented to the Senate Judiciary Committee and the John Ashcroft the women’s rights movement has known for over 20 years are not the same man. “I should know,” said Eleanor Smeal, president of the Feminist Majority. “As Missouri’s Attorney General, Ashcroft filed suit against the National Organization for Women (NOW) in 1978, when I was NOW’s president.” Ashcroft charged NOW with federal anti-trust violations and attempted to break the ERA convention boycott of unratified states. In the Judiciary Committee hearings last week, when asked by Senator Herb Kohl (D-WI), he led people to believe his purpose was simply to defend the tourism business in Missouri.

“His willingness to use the law and Missouri tax dollars to launch a three-year unsuccessful fight against NOW and the ERA all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court foreshadows how far he will go to fight and deny women’s rights,” continued Smeal. “His utter lack of understanding of freedom of political speech and the right to take political action to achieve social justice exemplifies a track record where his right-wing ideology prevails over his legal judgment.”

For over 20 years Ashcroft has attacked a woman’s right to abortion. “This is a man who in 1999 pushed an abortion ban (the Missouri Infant Protection Act) yet told us last week that Roe is the settled law of the land,” said Smeal. This Act would also have allowed the use of force against abortion doctors with its “justifiable defense” provision. At the time, Ashcroft urged Governor Mel Carnahan to sign what he called an “important bill.” When Carnahan vetoed the bill he explicitly noted this defense provision and called it “outrageous.”

Ashcroft’s support of the Infant Protection Act is all the more troubling in light of our 2000 National Clinic Violence Survey that reveals one in five of this nation’s abortion clinics experienced severe violence. In the past six years, severe violence at clinics has dropped from a high of 52 percent in 1995 to 20 percent in 2000. This drop occurred due to the 1994 federal Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act (FACE), the Justice Department’s enforcement of that law, and the concerted efforts of pro-choice groups nationwide.

We fear Ashcroft’s confirmation will send the wrong message to anti-abortion extremists. We note that Timothy Dreste, a Missouri anti-abortion extremist convicted under FACE and who served in the Missouri Republican State Central Committee under Ashcroft’s leadership, attended Sunday’s notorious White Rose Banquet wearing an Army of God sticker. That banquet is an annual gathering of convicted felons and their supporters with the stated purpose of celebrating anti-abortion violence.

While attending Sunday’s White Rose Banquet, some convicted felons – including a bomber, an arsonist, and violators of FACE – were encouraged by the Ashcroft nomination. In their words:

    “John Ashcroft is probably the only good man that has been appointed to a Cabinet position.” – Matthew Trewhella, leader of the Milwaukee, Wisconsin Missionaries to the Preborn, an extremist group that has undertaken violent tactics outside abortion clinics and is also a proponent of an armed right-wing militia.

    “Relative to Janet Reno, he’s an angel.” – Convicted clinic bomber and FACE violator Michael Bray, of Bowie, Maryland. Bray has also authored a book advocating “justifiable homicide”.


“This is horrifying,” said Smeal. “When a convicted abortion clinic bomber calls John Ashcroft ‘an angel,’ we all have reason to fear. We must remember that despite the two faces John Ashcroft has put forth, there is only one twenty-five year anti-woman’s rights reality.”

Media Resources:


© Feminist Majority Foundation, publisher of Ms. magazine

If you liked this story, consider making a tax-deductible donation to support Ms. magazine.

 

 

Send to a Friend
Their
Your
Comments
(optional)


More Feminist News

10/30/2014 Medication Abortion Access Threatened by Oklahoma Court Ruling - An Oklahoma state district court judge has refused to block a state law restricting medication abortion, clearing the way for the law to go into affect on November 1. The Oklahoma Coalition for Reproductive Justice, together with a local abortion clinic in Tulsa, challenged HB 2684 in September, arguing that the law was an unconstitutional restriction on non-surgical abortion in the earliest weeks of pregnancy. . . .
 
10/30/2014 UPS Switches Pregnant Worker Policy Ahead of Supreme Court Case - The United Parcel Service (UPS) is changing its policy on light duty assignments for pregnant workers, even though the company will stand by its refusal to extend accommodations to a former employee in an upcoming Supreme Court case. UPS announced on Monday in a memo to employees, and in a brief filed with the US Supreme Court, that the company will begin offering temporary, light-duty positions to pregnant workers on January 1, 2015. . . .
 
10/30/2014 North Dakota Medical Students Speak Out Against Measure 1 - Medical students at the University of North Dakota School of Medicine and Health Sciences are asking North Dakotans to vote no on Measure 1, a personhood measure on the state ballot this fall. The students issued published a letter in the Grand Forks Herald stating that they opposed Measure 1 in part because they are against "the government's taking control of the personal health care decisions of its citizens." Nearly 60 UND School of Medicine students signed the letter, citing concerns over the "very broad and ambiguous language" used in the proposed amendment, which has no regard for serious and life-threatening medical situations such as ectopic pregnancies. Measure 1 would change the North Dakota state constitution to create an "inalienable right to life" for humans "at any stage of development" - including the moment of fertilization and conception. . . .