On Tuesday, the United States slapped sanctions on Ariana Afghan Airlines because of the company's support of alleged terrorist Osama bin Laden.
White House spokesman David Leavy stated that "these sanctions are in response to the Talibanís continuing provision of safe haven to Osama bin Laden and his terrorist network. These sanctions will go into place immediately. We are concerned about the role they play in ferrying material, personnel, and finances to the Taliban."
According to Leavy, Ariana Afghan Airlines has approximately a half a million dollars in assets. Although no flights come through the United States, as many as 80 flights per day go through India and the United Arab Emirates, both of which are supporters of the Taliban.
These sanctions are intended to target overflight fees, a major source of the Talibanís legitimate financial resources. Raw opium, the primary ingredient in heroin, is Afghanistanís principal export and source of income. The sanctions also stress the prohibition of any U.S. interaction with the airline.
The United States is encouraging the United Arab Emirates and India to impose similar sanctions on the Taliban. It is reported that several companies, banks, and individuals are providing "financial and material support" for bin Ladenís terrorist organization. The Clinton Administration will slap similar sanctions on these supporters if they do not cease endorsing both bin Laden and the Taliban.
Mullah Mohammad Omar, leader of the Taliban, told the Afghan Islamic Press that "American sanctions will not force us to give over Osama. These sanctions on Ariana are cruel."
Media Resources: Agence France Press and Voice of America - August 10, 1999 and Reuters - August 11
8/28/2015 Alaska Court Protects Abortion Access for Low-Income Women - The Alaska Superior Court struck down a state law yesterday that would have severely limited abortion access for low-income women in Alaska.
The state's Superior Court also struck down a Department of Health and Social Services regulation that placed narrow specifications on Medicaid coverage for abortions, requiring that Medicaid-funded abortions be determined by a physician to be "medically necessary." Last year, the Center for Reproductive Rights, the American Civil Liberties Union, and Planned Parenthood sued on behalf of the Planned Parenthood of the Great Northwest, claiming that the narrow definition of "medically necessary" arbitrarily established conditions designed to restrict the ability of low-income women to access abortion services.
The law was temporarily blocked last July by an Alaskan state court judge.
Superior Court Judge John Suddock ordered yesterday that the state be blocked from implementing this regulation, ruling that it placed an undue burden on low-income women seeking abortion services in Alaska.
"By providing health care to all poor Alaskans except women who need abortions, the challenged regulation violates the state constitutional guarantee of 'equal rights, opportunities, and protection under the law'," the ruling read.
"We applaud the superior court for striing down these cruel restrictions on women's health and rights that violate the Alaska Constitution," said Chris Charbonneau, CEO of Planned Parenthood of the Great Northwest and the Hawaiian Islands. . . .
8/26/2015 Saudi Women Prepare to Vote for the First Time - The fight for gender equality is making slow but notable progress in Saudi Arabia, where women will be allowed to vote for the first time in upcoming December elections.
This shift in Saudi law came in 2011, when a royal decree announced that women would be allowed to vote and run in local elections beginning in December of 2015. . . .