On Tuesday, the United States slapped sanctions on Ariana Afghan Airlines because of the company's support of alleged terrorist Osama bin Laden.
White House spokesman David Leavy stated that "these sanctions are in response to the Taliban’s continuing provision of safe haven to Osama bin Laden and his terrorist network. These sanctions will go into place immediately. We are concerned about the role they play in ferrying material, personnel, and finances to the Taliban."
According to Leavy, Ariana Afghan Airlines has approximately a half a million dollars in assets. Although no flights come through the United States, as many as 80 flights per day go through India and the United Arab Emirates, both of which are supporters of the Taliban.
These sanctions are intended to target overflight fees, a major source of the Taliban’s legitimate financial resources. Raw opium, the primary ingredient in heroin, is Afghanistan’s principal export and source of income. The sanctions also stress the prohibition of any U.S. interaction with the airline.
The United States is encouraging the United Arab Emirates and India to impose similar sanctions on the Taliban. It is reported that several companies, banks, and individuals are providing "financial and material support" for bin Laden’s terrorist organization. The Clinton Administration will slap similar sanctions on these supporters if they do not cease endorsing both bin Laden and the Taliban.
Mullah Mohammad Omar, leader of the Taliban, told the Afghan Islamic Press that "American sanctions will not force us to give over Osama. These sanctions on Ariana are cruel."
Media Resources: Agence France Press and Voice of America - August 10, 1999 and Reuters - August 11
10/30/2014 Medication Abortion Access Threatened by Oklahoma Court Ruling - An Oklahoma state district court judge has refused to block a state law restricting medication abortion, clearing the way for the law to go into affect on November 1.
The Oklahoma Coalition for Reproductive Justice, together with a local abortion clinic in Tulsa, challenged HB 2684 in September, arguing that the law was an unconstitutional restriction on non-surgical abortion in the earliest weeks of pregnancy. The court's decision denied their request to temporarily block the legislation pending a final ruling on its constitutionality, rubber stamping the efforts of Oklahoma politicians to force doctors to use an outdated protocol for administering a medication abortion using the drug mifepristone - one that the medical community and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists have rejected in favor of a new standard of care that calls for a significantly lower dosage. . . .
10/29/2014 North Dakota Supreme Court Upholds Abortion Restrictions - The North Dakota Supreme Court yesterday upheld a set of misguided restrictions on medication abortion, allowing what is effectively a ban on early, non-surgical abortions in the state to go into effect immediately.
The decision overturned a lower court order finding the law, known as HB 1297, unconstitutional and permanently blocking its enforcement. . . .
10/29/2014 Georgia Court Refuses to Recognize 40K Voter Registrations From Primarily People of Color and Young People - A state court judge on Tuesday refused to order the Georgia Secretary of State to add some 40,000 voters to the voter rolls, potentially disenfranchising thousands of African Americans and other people of color in the state.
Judge Christopher Brasher of the Fulton County Superior Court denied a petition from the Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law (LCCR), the New Georgia Project and the Georgia branch of the NAACP asking the court to force Secretary of State Brian Kemp (R) to process an estimated 40,000 "missing" voter registrations.
More than 100,000 voters were registered by the three groups, but about a third of those registered never made the rolls. . . .