The 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled Friday that the federal Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) is unconstitutional. The case was brought by plaintiff Christy Brzonkala, who filed a federal lawsuit against the two former Virginia Tech students who are charged with raping her.
Passed in 1994, the VAWA gave victims of sex-based crimes like rape and domestic violence the right to sue their attackers for violating their civil rights as women. The Act also ordered the allocation of funds for battered women's programs and for centralized offices to help enforce protective orders.
As a result of Friday's ruling, women living in states where the Court has jurisdiction -- Virginia, Maryland, West Virginia, and the Carolinas -- will no longer be eligible to sue their attackers under VAWA. These women now must sue only under their state's tort laws, which have shorter statutes of limitations and lower caps on damages.
Legal experts predict that Brzonkala will appeal the case to the U.S. Supreme Court. Brzonkala's attorney, Eileen N. Wagner, agreed. "The Supreme Court was our original goal and I have a hard time envisioning we would pass up the test. Her (Brzonkala's) idea was, 'I'll make sure this doesn't happen to someone else.'"
9/12/2014 Violence Against Women Act Turns 20 - Saturday will be the 20th Anniversary of the groundbreaking federal Violence Against Women Act (VAWA).
Passed in 1994, VAWA was the first piece of federal legislation to specifically address domestic violence and sexual assault as crimes and to provide federal funding to improve local response to violence against women, including training and resources for law enforcement and judges.
President Barack Obama on Tuesday issued a proclamation commemorating the VAWA anniversary. . . .
9/12/2014 Indiana Woman Charged With Feticide For Premature Delivery - An Indiana woman has been charged with feticide after she delivered prematurely and sought hospital treatment.
Purvi Patel, 33, sought help at an emergency room for vaginal bleeding where it was discovered that she had delivered prematurely at home. . . .