Ms. magazine  -- more than a magazine a movement

SIGN UP FOR MS. DIGEST, JOBS, NEWS AND ALERTS

FEMINIST WIRE NEWSBRIEFS

ABOUT
SEE CURRENT ISSUE
SHOP MS. STORE
MS. IN THE CLASSROOM
FEMINIST DAILY WIRE
FEMINIST RESOURCES
PRESS
JOBS AT MS.
READ BACK ISSUES
CONTACT
RSS (XML)
 
feminist wire | daily newsbriefs

February-03-99

Federal Jury Finds "Un-wanted" Posters And "Nuremberg Files" To Be Threats, Not Free Speech

Washington DC -- Today, in Portland Oregon, a jury handed down the precedent-setting decision in the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances (FACE ) and RICO (Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act) lawsuit, Planned Parenthood of the Columbia/Willamette v. American Coalition of Life Activists et. al. This case originally filed in October, 1995, has resulted in the largest single punitive damage ever awarded by a jury to pro-choice forces, 107.5 million dollars. For the first time in a national case, "Un-Wanted Posters," and the infamous internet hit list "The Nuremberg Files" have been deemed threats under federal law, not protected free speech.

Both Eleanor Smeal, President of the Feminist Majority Foundation, and Katherine Spillar, National Coordinator of the Feminist Majority Foundation, have been targeted on the Nuremberg Files.

Smeal commented on the national significance of today's decision saying:

"Finally, common sense prevails - threats are deemed threats. This jury not only left no doubt that these are threats but by assessing a 107 million dollars in punitive damages, they said loud and clear that this is serious and must stop. We hope today's decision will embolden federal law enforcement to take criminal FACE and RICO cases to shut down the anti-abortion reign of terror once and for all.

For years, we have believed "Un-Wanted Posters" and similar materials amount to threats of violence against abortion providers and advocates.

Finally, after years of threats and violence, pro choice forces have succeeded in holding accountable in a federal case, a core of anti-abortion extremists whose actions we believe have endangered the lives of those who work every day in this country to provide women access to reproductive healthcare.

"This jury decision indicates a turning of the anti-abortion violent tide. Today's verdict marks the second time in less than a year a federal jury has found a nationwide network of extremists liable for an orchestrated campaign of terror. In April of 1998 pro-choice forces won the NOW et. al. v. Scheidler et. al. lawsuit, which found a network of extremists liable for over 100 counts of violence and extortion in violation of the federal RICO statute. After that victory, we called for federal law enforcement to take a criminal case to stop the terrorism at clinics. We renew that call today. We urge federal law enforcement authorities to bring this orchestrated campaign of terror and violence to an end through criminal prosecution under FACE and RICO."

Media Resources: Press Release, Feminist Majority Foundation, February 3, 1999


© Feminist Majority Foundation, publisher of Ms. magazine

If you liked this story, consider making a tax-deductible donation to support Ms. magazine.

 

 

Send to a Friend
Their
Your
Comments
(optional)


More Feminist News

10/31/2014 Federal Judge Exempts Another Catholic University from Birth Control Coverage - A federal judge ruled Tuesday that Ave Maria University, a Catholic university in Florida, does not have to comply with federal rules meant to ensure that covered employees can exercise their right to obtain birth control at no cost. The Affordable Care Act requires all new health insurance plans to cover all FDA-approved contraceptives - such as the pill, emergency contraceptives, and IUDs - without charging co-pays, deductibles or co-insurance. . . .
 
10/31/2014 Women of Color in Tennessee Are United in Opposition to Amendment 1 - Just days before the general election in Tennessee, a coalition of community leaders, clergy, and advocates led a press conference encouraging women of color to vote no on Amendment 1, a dangerous and far-reaching measure on the state's ballot. SisterReach, a grassroots organization focused on "empowering, organizing, and mobilizing women and girls in the community around their reproductive and sexual health to make informed decisions about themselves," organized the press conference "to call attention to the unique concerns Black and poor communities throughout Shelby County and across the state of Tennessee face on a daily basis" and to emphasize how the upcoming election "could further limit [black women's] reproductive, economic, political, and social autonomy." "We assemble today to impress upon black women and women of color, many of whom are heads of households, to get out and vote," said SisterReacher Founder and CEO Cherisse Scott at the event. SisterReach has been educating voters about the particularly dangerous impact of Amendment 1 on women of color. . . .
 
10/30/2014 Medication Abortion Access Threatened by Oklahoma Court Ruling - An Oklahoma state district court judge has refused to block a state law restricting medication abortion, clearing the way for the law to go into affect on November 1. The Oklahoma Coalition for Reproductive Justice, together with a local abortion clinic in Tulsa, challenged HB 2684 in September, arguing that the law was an unconstitutional restriction on non-surgical abortion in the earliest weeks of pregnancy. . . .