Ms. magazine  -- more than a magazine a movement

SIGN UP FOR MS. DIGEST, JOBS, NEWS AND ALERTS

FEMINIST WIRE NEWSBRIEFS

ABOUT
SEE CURRENT ISSUE
SHOP MS. STORE
MS. IN THE CLASSROOM
FEMINIST DAILY WIRE
FEMINIST RESOURCES
PRESS
JOBS AT MS.
READ BACK ISSUES
CONTACT
RSS (XML)
 
feminist wire | daily newsbriefs

May-18-99

More Women Play College Sports, Yet Inequity Persists

A recent Chronicle of Higher Education study of U.S. women's participation in collegiate sports yielded both positive and negative results. The good news is that more women college students are participating in sports programs. The bad news is that women's numbers still lag far behind men's, and that men's athletic programs still continue to receive more institutional funding and support than do women's.

The study was based on 306 reports issued by Division I colleges and universities under the 1996 Equity in Athletics Disclosure Act. Four of Division I's 310 schools failed to provide the Chronicle of Higher Education with these reports after repeated requests. They included Alabama State University, Jackson State University, Oral Roberts University, and the University of the Pacific.

During the 1997-1998 school year, women made up 53% of Division I undergraduates, and 40% of Division I athletes, up from 35% in 1996-1997. While forty percent of available athletic scholarship funds were allocated to women athletes (up from 14% from the previous year), only 32% of recruiting funds and 36% of total operating budgets were reserved for their use. In perhaps the most disappointing finding, the coaches of women's teams took home only 28% of the total funds reserved for coaching salaries.

The percentage of women athletes at Division I-A and Division I-AA schools with football teams was the lowest -- at 38 and 37%, respectively -- most likely because football teams are so large. Division I-A football teams often have 100 or more players, 85 of whom are granted scholarships. Division I-AA teams typically have 80 players each and award 63 scholarships. At Division I-AAA schools, which do not have football teams, women made up 47% of all student athletes.

The Office for Civil Rights Title IX of the 1972 Educational Amendment considers schools to be compliance with Title IX if the school passes any one of 3 standards concerning the amount of scholarship money awarded women's programs, the percentage of women athletes in relation to the number of women students, and the allocation of resources including facilities, coaching, and equipment.

Media Resources: Chronicle of Higher Education - May 21, 1999 issue


© Feminist Majority Foundation, publisher of Ms. magazine

If you liked this story, consider making a tax-deductible donation to support Ms. magazine.

 

 

Send to a Friend
Their
Your
Comments
(optional)


More Feminist News

9/12/2014 Violence Against Women Act Turns 20 - Saturday will be the 20th Anniversary of the groundbreaking federal Violence Against Women Act (VAWA). Passed in 1994, VAWA was the first piece of federal legislation to specifically address domestic violence and sexual assault as crimes and to provide federal funding to improve local response to violence against women, including training and resources for law enforcement and judges. President Barack Obama on Tuesday issued a proclamation commemorating the VAWA anniversary. . . .
 
9/12/2014 Indiana Woman Charged With Feticide For Premature Delivery - An Indiana woman has been charged with feticide after she delivered prematurely and sought hospital treatment. Purvi Patel, 33, sought help at an emergency room for vaginal bleeding where it was discovered that she had delivered prematurely at home. . . .
 
9/11/2014 Missouri Legislators Pass 72-Hour Abortion Waiting Period Law - Missouri legislators voted late last night to triple the state's current 24-hour waiting period to 72 hours, with no exceptions for rape or incest. Governor Jay Nixon previously vetoed the bill in July, calling it "extreme and disrespectful." Missouri's House voted 117-44 to override the veto, and then the Senate used a procedural move to stop a Democratic filibuster of the bill and vote 23-7 to complete the veto override Wednesday. "The only purpose of a 72-hour waiting period is to attempt to punish, shame, and demean women who have arrived at a personal decision that politicians happen to disagree with," said the president and CEO of the Center for Reproductive Rights in a statement. . . .